¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Why do some threads remain under one title will other threads display multiple times?

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:30 PM, SafeTex wrote:
And how should modified headers be controlled? I mean where the header gets modified by the user or their software and then appears like a separate topic with a similar name
The site does its best to keep that from happening.? It checks to see if there's and In-Reply-To header to connect it to a message.? If there is none, it check subject lines from up to 3 days ago in an attempt to keep things properly threaded.

It also ignores many of the common reply indicators such as Re: when trying to figure out where an emailed message should go.? If you consistently see one that isn't ignored, you can report it on the beta group and Mark may add it in.? That sometimes happens with languages other than English.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Why do some threads remain under one title will other threads display multiple times?

 

Tex,

Also don't overlook that fact that if even one keystroke in the subject line of a reply to an existing topic is changed, deleted or added (even a blank space) then the system recognizes it as a different topic and therefore it is not threaded.

OK ¡ª HTH

Paul M.
==


Re: Why do some threads remain under one title will other threads display multiple times?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


On 2023-06-16 00:28, SafeTex via groups.io wrote:

/g/GroupManagersForum/message/44002
and
/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/99392063#44058


This is because those are two different views as Frances said.?

The first one is a direct link to a message in (single) Message view, so it displays just that message (the number is the message id) with the rest of the thread collapsed, but which you can expand, when you click the View All x Messages In Topic.? That changes the link to the second one, a link to the Topic view which comes already expanded, but with also a reference (#44058) to the particular message so the view autoscrolls down so the referenced message comes into the screen; if that reference hadn't been provided, i.e. the link was just /g/GroupManagersForum/topic/99392063, you would be viewing the first message in that thread instead.?

So the same (expanded) Topic+Message reference link for the first example you provided would be /g/GroupManagersForum/topic/99338271 or /g/GroupManagersForum/topic/99338271#44002 if you wanted to focus on that particular message, and the corollary for the second example, the direct link to the message would be, /g/GroupManagersForum/message/44058.

As to which one gets used, it depends on what button or link you clicked while online, or how the link was provided by the sender in their message.

Cheers,
Christos



Re: Why do some threads remain under one title will other threads display multiple times?

 

Just something - on the group home page you can have your messages grouped by topic, by messages and by expanded messages.?


About similar topics that should be one topic - you can merge them. All in the help.?


Frances
--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Why do some threads remain under one title will other threads display multiple times?

 

Hello everyone

I know this is partly to do with things getting added to headers like "Re" but if you take two recent threads in this very group,

/g/GroupManagersForum/message/44002
and
/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/99392063#44058

the first one only appears just once on my web browser with 9 messages if you open it will the second one appears multiple times with 45 messages if you open any one of them

I see to that when I copied the links to discuss this, one link includes the word "message" and the other one "topic".

That aside, this behaviour has always confused me and is another reason why I find the IO group forum hard to follow at times plus it eats up my screen estate (the second thread).

And how should modified headers be controlled? I mean where the header gets modified by the user or their software and then appears like a separate topic with a similar name

Thanks


Locked Re: HEIC (was: Query over 'Max Attachment Size')

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 07:42 PM, Larry Finch wrote:
So should certainly support it.
Groups.io doesn't "support" any format.? The images are just stored on the site (actually at AWS) and fed to your browser.? The browser is what has to be able to open them.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Locked Re: HEIC (was: Query over 'Max Attachment Size')

 

HEIC is NOT a proprietary format. It is a worldwide standard developed to replace JPG; it provides higher quality images?that are generally smaller than an equivalent JPG. It was first created 10 years ago by the MPEG group, and became a standard in 2015. Apple was the first to support it in 2017,?which is why it has gotten a reputation of being "proprietary", but Apple doesn't own?it,?and anyone can use?it. It is not compatible with older photo editing and storage apps that have not been updated, but is supported by Google, Microsoft, Adobe and many other photo management systems.

So should certainly support it.

L

--
Larry Finch

N 40¡ã 53' 50"
W 74¡ã 02' 55"


Locked HEIC (was: Query over 'Max Attachment Size')

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 02:14 PM, Mike Hanauer wrote:
I would love to see groups.io accept the .heic photo format.
Mike -- Changing the subject line so as not to hijack the previous thread.

The main problem is that HEIC is a proprietary format. As such, many browsers won't display them.

Regards,
Bruce

Check out the groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual


Locked Re: HEIC (was: Query over 'Max Attachment Size')

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 01:14 PM, Mike Hanauer wrote:
I would love to see groups.io accept the .heic photo format. It is much smaller and/or higher resolution than .jpg.
?
Is this being considered?
There's nothing that I know of to keep you from uploading or attaching them, other than a lot of people won't be able to open them.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Locked HEIC (was: Query over 'Max Attachment Size')

 

I would love to see groups.io accept the .heic photo format. It is much smaller and/or higher resolution than .jpg.

Is this being considered?

Consider Better, not Bigger. So many advantages. Just ask. USA adds a Chicago to our overpop each year.
"Still more population growth is not our way to a healthy community, a healthy planet, OR enjoyable cycling."

? ? ~Mike


On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 01:28:23 PM EDT, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:


On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 08:25 AM, Jeremy Harrison wrote:
But for member with Max Attachment size '500kB', the attached e-mail arrives with attachments replaced by links - not as expected. (As attachments are only 433kB)
That's correct.? Remember that emailed attachments are up to 50% larger than the actual file because of overhead.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Query over 'Max Attachment Size'

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 08:25 AM, Jeremy Harrison wrote:
But for member with Max Attachment size '500kB', the attached e-mail arrives with attachments replaced by links - not as expected. (As attachments are only 433kB)
That's correct.? Remember that emailed attachments are up to 50% larger than the actual file because of overhead.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Query over 'Max Attachment Size'

 

Attachments are JPGs. Post is e-mail sent from Thunderbird (e-mail program), which shows sent e-mail as having 2 attachments, 433kB; and sent e-mail size as 597kB.
On receipt (from Groups.io) Thunderbird shows it as having 2 attachments, 467 kB, with e-mail size of 652kB - for member with Max Attachment size 'unlimited'

But for member with Max Attachment size '500kB', the attached e-mail arrives with attachments replaced by links - not as expected. (As attachments are only 433kB)

Jeremy?


Re: Query over 'Max Attachment Size'

 

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Harrison wrote:
I ask having had unexpected results from a post with two attachments totalling about 450 kB.
You might tweak your preferences about size.

Or perhaps there is a problem with your attachments? What kind of attachments? Are you using the paperclip icon or the Add Pictures icon?

Frances
?
--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Re: Query over 'Max Attachment Size'

 

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Harrison wrote:
Is the test for 'Max Attachment Size' done on the (total) attachments (only) size, (as one would expect), or on the total message size (including attachments, text, headings, ....)?
Items that count towards the storage limit
These items are counted towards your group¡¯s storage limit:
Files
Photos
Images in databases
Images on wiki pages
Message attachments
Note: The contents of messages (message bodies) are not counted towards the storage limit. Only attachments are counted.
Items that do not count towards the storage limit

These items are not counted towards your group¡¯s storage limit:
Message contents (message bodies)
Wiki pages
Database tables
Chats
Polls
?
?See?/helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/viewing-and-managing-your-group-s-storage?single=true

Frances
--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Re: Query over 'Max Attachment Size'

 

A follow up query, if anybody is able to elucidate:
Is the test for 'Max Attachment Size' done on the (total) attachments (only) size, (as one would expect), or on the total mesage size (including attachments, text, headings, ....)?

I ask having had unexpected results from a post with two attachments totalling about 450 kB.

Jeremy?


On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 02:42 PM, Duane wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:31 AM, Jeremy Harrison wrote:
Is the 'Max Attachment Size' (for 'attachments that you receive in group email messages') in User Advanced Preferences a value per attachment or per email message?
Based on a quick test, it's the total.? I sent a message with a 169KB file and a 65KB file with a limit of 100KB and both were converted to links in the email I received.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Allow groups.io messages to be more personal

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


On 2023-06-14 15:10, Peter S. Shenkin via groups.io wrote:
I have no plan to add a discussion group to this group. In view of that, do you still think it's a mistake to leave it open for viewing and for membership?

Personally, if it was my group, I'd have it Announcement-Only as you have, with access to the Directory and Member List disabled, and public I guess would be OK, as long as I have it setup so new applicants have to be approved, and also set a Pending Membership questionnaire notice so they can reply to let you know why they want to join.? That should help safeguard against most of the undesirables, as most of the times they don't bother replying to the questionnaire.? Another advantage of screening applicants is that IIRC, just like the Welcome notice that Pending Membership notice doesn't contain any boilerplate text.

For example, if I meet someone at a gig and they want to get announcements of my?gigs, could I not just invite them to join?

Yes, and that would be the preferable way since those folks don't get that questionnaire notice (since you invited them it is assumed they are legit), so as long as they accept the invitation they become members right away.? It's like DirectAdd in a sense but the difference is the member has to "push" the final button to become member instead of being added by you, so the onus is on them to actively do something to become a member, which also more-or-less verifies they are interested in joining.? Leave DirectAdd when you're dealing with someone maybe not computer-savvy, or having email problems, etc.? Invired members will get just the Welcome notice (from your group after accepting the invitation, they may also get a system generated notice beforehand if they had to create a new groups.io account)

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Allow groups.io messages to be more personal

 

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:26 PM, Peter S. Shenkin wrote:
What would be the downside of that, and what alternative might be better??
Since it is an announcement only group, probably no downside.

You could add a footer that is added automatically to each message -?
In Admin, Settings, Message Formatting.

Perhaps you could put "Find me online at (put your groups.io account) or through Google."

Frances

--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Re: Allow groups.io messages to be more personal

 

Hi,

I have no plan to add a discussion group to this group.

In view of that, do you still think it's a mistake to leave it open for viewing and for membership? For example, if I meet someone at a gig and they want to get announcements of my?gigs, could I not just invite them to join?

What would be the downside of that, and what alternative might be better??

-P.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 2:17?PM Christos Psarras <christos@...> wrote:

On 2023-06-14 10:31, Peter S. Shenkin via wrote:
The issue for me isn't privacy but a more user-friendly atmosphere. So I don't mind people I don't know joining and looking in.

You should be very careful having your group wide-open like that and also public, especially if you create a discussion subgroup, as spammers/scammers will eventually sneak in if the front door is open.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Allow groups.io messages to be more personal

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


On 2023-06-14 10:31, Peter S. Shenkin via groups.io wrote:
The issue for me isn't privacy but a more user-friendly atmosphere. So I don't mind people I don't know joining and looking in.

You should be very careful having your group wide-open like that and also public, especially if you create a discussion subgroup, as spammers/scammers will eventually sneak in if the front door is open.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Allow groups.io messages to be more personal

 

Thanks, Donald. I am already a member. I did report a concern a few weeks ago which, in fact, Mark took care of.

-P.?


On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 9:49 AM Donald Hellen <donhellen@...> wrote:
Peter,

Join the beta group here at the link Duane provided earlier:



and state your suggestion with this at the end of the subject line:

#Suggestion

like:

Subject: Change Direct Add Message #Suggestion

and start a discussion. The owner will see it. There will be some
discussion about it and then the owner will likely comment.

Donald



----------------------------------------------------
Some ham radio groups you may be interested in:
/g/ICOM? ?/g/Ham-Antennas
/g/HamRadioHelp? ? /g/Baofeng
/g/CHIRP?