Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- 7x12MiniLathe
- Messages
Search
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
I have to admit I didn't even notice this in the original?email.? Yes, probably too big for a mini-mill. Mike Taglieri? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 1:06 PM Ralph Lehotsky <ralphlehotsky@...> wrote: An 8" rotary table seems awfully large for a mini-mill, even in the horizontal position.? The x-y table? is only about 4" wide, so an 8" rotary would limit the y-axis motion of the mill severely, and the height (& weight) would be quite cumbersome.? I would go no larger than a?5" rotary table, and a 4" is probably the most useful on a mini-mill. |
Surplus find note
Just came in over the transom: American Science and Surplus has these for $12.50
They¡¯re NEMA-17 stepper-driven pumps, 500?l (? ml) , might be useful for automatic oiling if you¡¯re setting up a CNC or ELS system; if nothing else the steppers included retail for $79 from the manufacturer. -- Bruce Johnson "Wherever you go, there you are." B. Banzai, PhD |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
An 8" rotary table seems awfully large for a mini-mill, even in the horizontal position.? The x-y table? is only about 4" wide, so an 8" rotary would limit the y-axis motion of the mill severely, and the height (& weight) would be quite cumbersome.? I would go no larger than a?5" rotary table, and a 4" is probably the most useful on a mini-mill.
That said, if you have or are panning on obtaining a larger mill, then the 8" would be an excellent addition, especially with a dividing plate. ralphie |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Miket_NYC wrote:
The mini-mill group is pretty much dead, so it's fine with me to ask milling questions here.? Most of us do milling here anyway, on our lathes if we don't have mills.Thanks. This is a very active group with a lot of diverse users. I try not stray too far from the intent of the group. |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Miket_NYC wrote:
I didn't look at the flyer before. I have a Palmgren milling attachment, and your easiest option for vertical mounting would be to clamp the rotary table onto the tableI agree that this is not going to be a super rigid mount. The only "true" surface on the back is the dovetail. I'll have to take it apart to see how thick the unmachined part of the back is. If I had not gotten it so cheap it would not worth all this fiddle'n. |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
I barely can?see it mounted on the lathe on your link page.Do you have the flier you could post or send to me?I don't have that flier. It's not my ad. It's from a Palmgren catalog page 13. |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
The mini-mill group is pretty much dead, so it's fine with me to ask milling questions here.? Most of us do milling here anyway, on our lathes if we don't have mills. Mike Taglieri? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 10:24 AM Ralph Hulslander <rhulslander@...> wrote:
|
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
I didn't look at the flyer before. I have a Palmgren milling attachment, and your easiest option for vertical mounting would be to clamp the rotary table onto the table of your mill the same way it attaches to a toolpost, using a? T-nut, 3/8" bolt and a bar from the usual clamping kit.? This would hold it as sturdily as it was intended to be on a lathe. (Which is not very). But I suspect you'll mostly use it horizontally. For that I would remove the Palmgren mount and its lead screw and fasten the rotary table to a plate large enough to clamp onto the milling machine table with the standard clamping kit.? For this you'll have to make four threaded holes in the back of the rotary table for screws. I'd probably use socket head cap screws and either recess them or arrange for them to fall where they? don't hit the rails of the milling machine table. You should make these easily removable because you'll have to put the Palmgren attachment back on to use it vertically again. But if I were doing this, I would still mount it vertically on an angle plate, using the same four screws. I disagree that angle plates are too big. Cheap Chinese ones are made of cast iron and come in different sizes, and if necessary you can saw one down so it isn't any bigger than the? rotary table.? This would be massively more rigid than that Palmgren attachment.? Mike Taglieri? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 11:08 AM fxkl47BF via <fxkl47BF=[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Miket_NYC wrote: |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
I barely can?see it mounted on the lathe on your link page. Do you have the flier you could post or send to me? You would have to deal with the height on your mill no matter the mounting method. The rotary would not be mounted directly under your mill spindle so I do not see a problem there. Ralph On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:08 AM fxkl47BF via <fxkl47BF=[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Miket_NYC wrote: |
Re: Starrett Precision Universal Vernier Bevel Protractor
I did too.? His yahoo account didn't?work,? at least for me.? Mike Taglieri? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 11:06 AM Ralph Hulslander <rhulslander@...> wrote:
|
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Miket_NYC wrote:
I assume it mounts horizontally now, right? If so, no need to hack it. Just put it on an angle plate.As the flier in the add shows it was made to mount on the toolpost of a lathe. I could mount it vertically with a couple of 123 blocks but not very steady. If I put it on a large angle plate I would not have enough room between it and the mill spindle. |
Re: Starrett Precision Universal Vernier Bevel Protractor
I am interested also. I tried to send a message to your Yahoo account. Ralph On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:47 AM Miket_NYC <mctaglieri@...> wrote:
|
Re: Starrett Precision Universal Vernier Bevel Protractor
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 8:47 AM OldToolmaker via <old_toolmaker=[email protected]> wrote: I have a Starrett C364 Precision Vernier Bevel Protractor that was my Dad¡¯s. It is in a ?nice fitted wood case. Condition is like new. I have no need for it as I have one of my own. If anyone is interested please contact me off forum. |
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
Strange that you asked this on a Mini Lathe group. I had a discussion last year about doing exactly this turn out getting a large 90¡ã angle piece to mount the rotary table to? was the best solution. Of course this is a pain if you want to use the table horizontally as it has to be unbolted from the angle piece.? Ralph On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:14 AM fxkl47BF via <fxkl47BF=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: rotary table re-engineeering
I assume it mounts horizontally now, right? If so, no need to hack it. Just put it on an angle plate. Mike Taglieri? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 10:14 AM fxkl47BF via <fxkl47BF=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Starrett Precision Universal Vernier Bevel Protractor
I have a Starrett C364 Precision Vernier Bevel Protractor that was my Dad¡¯s. It is in a ?nice fitted wood case. Condition is like new. I have no need for it as I have one of my own. If anyone is interested please contact me off forum.
-- Dick ?OFF-SET TAILSTOCK CENTER PLANS
?SMALL TURRET TOOL POST PLANS? ?LARGE TURRET TOOL POST PLANS ?MINI-LATHE CARRIAGE LOCK PLANS ?SMALL QC TOOL POST PLANS? ?QUICK CHANGE LATHE TURRET ?MINI LATHE COMPOUND PIVOT MODIFICATION |
Locked
Re: Indicator holder - 3d printed
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMaybe you thought? of the Yahoo group. Which was moved to? .IO
because of Yahoo's craziness On 1/20/22 08:25, Ryan H via groups.io
wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Indicator holder - 3d printed
This is the 7x12 group. I didn't think it was active anymore.?
On Jan 20, 2022, 8:54 AM -0500, Robert Francis <bobf0648@...>, wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Indicator holder - 3d printed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I must have mistakenly signed on to a group I don¡¯t belong to. I thought this was the 7x12 minilathe group. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss