开云体育

I just tried this again ... and it worked. The difference? I have no idea. As a note ... my high end Tek VNA measured the "test awful load" at 57.91+97.35j (|Z|=113.27). The nanoVNA, with applied

/Sorry, no text. /I happened to have the opportunity to measure the same as Roger did when I read this post. Exactly the same measurements made (from 50 kHz to 50 MHz). Calibrated with SDR-Kits BNC

Op 12-5-2022 om 04:03 schreef Rich NE1EE:

I am running the Saver 0.4 version with a nanoVNA V2Plus4 with FW git-20210530-412578c Ralph WA2PUX YouTube Channel: Electronics for the Inquisitive Experimenter

Thanks for the update...It might be related to Saver version, because 0.4 is the latest...and it might be related to -H4 firmware version...what are you running?

I am using NanoVNA Saver 3.10. Offset delay works for me. I calibrated my NanoVNA-H4 device (Not in Saver) from 50 kHz. to 300 MHz. and then attached a 12 inch cable to CH0 (Port 1). You can see the

WOW! Seems like a lot of hoops to jump through to use the Saver software when measuring impedance. The "VNA View" software does it slick as can be. So, I suppose that the thought is to use the "VNA

Many thanks for your analysis and comments Roger! -- Best Regards, Tom, VA7TA

Maybe nothing :-) There are some things in Saver that don't work well. I havna tried this approach, but have applied e-delay on my -H4, and it works as expected. I take two approaches to using remote

1 - Keeping topics fresh and to the point enhances the groups.io Message Search function. 2 - I lock my group topics after 20 days. (By the end of 10-15 responses, almost every thread gets hijacked to

When a topic has not had any posts for a period of time (months or years) it is better to start a new topic. Posting to the old topic is considered "necroposting" and is discouraged in most groups.

New to nano VNA ... just got the latest and greatest. I've used port extensions with my higher end Tek VNA and my "miniVNA tiny". I successfully applied port extension with the "VNA View" software

groups.io does not offer the full capabilities of an actual "forum" software where you can properly categorize content. While those are ideal, to have the best function and access it would require

Many groups.io users receive their content via email listserv. While I agree with your perspective, it's not fully compatible with listserv subscribers. va3rr

I am on another forum where we have created topic posts, and those posts are only links to message threads about that topic. Anyone can add to the topic post thread. For example, here we might have

Hi to all I note, with disappointment, that many members start new discussions on topics already covered in previous discussions. Why not post messages to those threads instead of creating new ones?

Tom, Thank you for taking the time to make your post. In particular I noted the following: - The calculated inductance of your 4.7 uH inductor varied from 4.56 to 4.82 uH _(+2.5 to -3%) over a wide

Great project and information! Many thanks, Tom! Dave, KE9ED

Very interesting. Thank you for sharing :-) -- VE6WGM

Greetings All, As L/C component value measurement appears to be a present topic of interest here I decided throw my 2 cents in by posting a couple of tables that show the measurements results from