I just tried this again ... and it worked.
The difference? I have no idea.
As a note ... my high end Tek VNA measured the "test awful load" at 57.91+97.35j (|Z|=113.27). The nanoVNA, with applied delay, reported 57.8+93.2j (|Z|=109.67). This is about a 3% difference. I say this is REALLY good.
So ... it looks like we are good to go!
Ralph
WA2PUX
YouTube Channel: Electronics for the Inquisitive Experimenter
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
------ Original Message ------
From: "PE0CWK via groups.io" <pe0cwk@...>
To:
[email protected]Sent: 5/12/2022 8:32:19 AM
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Saver software - Offest Delay seems inoperative
/Sorry, no text.
/I happened to have the opportunity to measure the same as Roger did when I read this post.
Exactly the same measurements made (from 50 kHz to 50 MHz).
Calibrated with SDR-Kits BNC Cal Kit.
Measurement done with NanoVna -H4 (fw. version 0.5.0) and NanoVna Saver version 0.3.9
Cable used: RG58 A/U
Op 12-5-2022 om 04:03 schreef Rich NE1EE:
On 2022-05-11 18:20:-0700, you wrote:
I am using NanoVNA Saver 3.10. Offset delay works for me.
I calibrated my NanoVNA-H4 device
Thanks for the update...It might be related to Saver version, because 0.4 is the latest...and it might be related to -H4 firmware version...what are you running?
