Correction:
?
The speed up plus is translated to chr$(187) ?
andthe speed down minus is translated to chr$(171) ?
?
SeventyThree(s).
On 11/07/2024 2:57 PM EST Bob via groups.io <k4cy@...> wrote:
?
?
I made a macro BLAH BLAH $SPEED +++++$? BLAH BLAH
?
When I click on the macro button the transmit pane of the CW Machine is populated? BLAH BLAH ????? IBLAH BLAH. The + is translated to ? chr$(187). And it I had $SPEED - - - - -$? the - is translated to ? Chr$(171)
?
When the CW Machine sees a ? or a ??it does not transmit the character, it bumps the speed up or down.
?
I assume your PC does not use the same character set and the chr$(187) is a / or something. SeventyThree(s).
?
On 11/07/2024 12:10 PM EST Regin, OY1R <dreamglider@...> wrote:
?
?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
I made a macro BLAH BLAH $SPEED +++++$? BLAH BLAH
?
When I click on the macro button the transmit pane of the CW Machine is populated? BLAH BLAH ????? IBLAH BLAH. The + is translated to ? chr$(187). And it I had $SPEED - - - - -$? the - is translated to ? Chr$(171)
?
When the CW Machine sees a ? or a ??it does not transmit the character, it bumps the speed up or down.
?
I assume your PC does not use the same character set and the chr$(187) is a / or something. SeventyThree(s).
?
On 11/07/2024 12:10 PM EST Regin, OY1R <dreamglider@...> wrote:
?
?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:46 AM, Regin, OY1R wrote:
i use the Winkeyer and the hardware microHAM Digi Keyer II. I just updated logger32, still not working, now the $speed+$ macro command sends "/"
it sends the + in the $speed+$ an a "/" ( -..-. )
If the macro is $call$ $speed++++++$ $sentrstn$ it sends "OY1R ////// 5NN"
?
?
?
Regin, OY1R
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
Daniel,
?
Have you read and followed the instructions in the G90 manual? url:
?
?
?
?
--
Gerald, VE1DT
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
Have you tried selecting any of the ICOM radio types, Daniel, or the plain ICOM setting?? ?
I'm not sure what CIV hex address and baudrate your radio uses though.
73 Gary? ?beater/tester &?
Honor Roll &? checker
It's interesting how flat answers can be published.
Logger32 has NO IC-7000, Aron, ?selection for a TRX.
Of course I've already tried it all, otherwise I wouldn't be asking here ?
?
Daniel
HB9DDS
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
It's interesting how flat answers can be published.
Logger32 has NO IC-7000, Aron, ?selection for a TRX.
Of course I've already tried it all, otherwise I wouldn't be asking here ?
?
Daniel
HB9DDS
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
Try using JTDX. SeventyThree(s).
On 11/05/2024 7:27 PM EST Arturo LU6ETB <lu6etb@...> wrote:
?
?
Hi Aki,
?
Thanks for the tips.
I think, I have tried all the combinations without luck.
On each combination, I start calling CQ and all the QSOs are logged automatically.
?
After some time, the WSJT-X window requesting to to press ok? to log the qso appears.
If I don't press ok, the qso is not transferred to Logger.
?
Same behavour when using Cherry Picking.
?
73 de Arturo, LU6ETB
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
I do not remember your original message.
When QSO is logged in wsjtx, this QSO is not logged automatically in Logger32. Is this your problem ?
Run wsjtx always from UDP BandMap.? Check "Enable contemporaneous user input sequence" option. Uncheck "TCP/ADIF logging" option Otherwise it does not work correctly.
On 2024-11-06 Ë®ê×ÈÕ 9:27:19, Arturo LU6ETB via groups.io <lu6etb@...> wrote: Hi Aki,
?
Thanks for the tips.
I think, I have tried all the combinations without luck.
On each combination, I start calling CQ and all the QSOs are logged automatically.
?
After some time, the WSJT-X window requesting to to press ok? to log the qso appears.
If I don't press ok, the qso is not transferred to Logger.
?
Same behavour when using Cherry Picking.
?
73 de Arturo, LU6ETB
|
Re: FT8 QSOs not logged automatically
Hi Aki,
?
Thanks for the tips.
I think, I have tried all the combinations without luck.
On each combination, I start calling CQ and all the QSOs are logged automatically.
?
After some time, the WSJT-X window requesting to to press ok? to log the qso appears.
If I don't press ok, the qso is not transferred to Logger.
?
Same behavour when using Cherry Picking.
?
73 de Arturo, LU6ETB
|
Re: Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
I have no idea.?
?
But it's amazing what you can find on the Internet in five minutes with Google. The G90 manual says to use the Icom IC-7000 protocol and requires an Icom CI-V interface. Serial port settings (baud/parity/stop bits etc.) are all listed.
?
SeventyThree(s).
On 11/05/2024 3:17 AM EST HB9DDS <hb9dds@...> wrote:
?
?
[Edited Message Follows]
Hello to ALL
?
Does anyone use Logger32 with a Xiegu G90`If so, what are the settings for data transfer (CAT Control)? Nothing works here.
?
Daniel
HB9DDS
|
Logger32 and ... XIEGU G90
Hello to ALL
?
Does anyone use Logger32 with a Xiegu G90`If so, what are the settings for data transfer (CAT Control)? Nothing works here.
?
Daniel
HB9DDS
|
It is not done by the new Logsync. This happened to me with the older version as well. I haven't experienced it recently though.
73
HA1AR Ern?
|
Re: Stupid question - how to open search pane?
Bob,
I was working with an incomplete log, not containing all my sat QSOs.
So instead of finding a logging program that works, I should look for a user that knows how to use it¡.
My apologies for bandwidth.
?
73
Paul
?
?
Send me an ADIF export file of some of your satellite QSOs, I will test it here. SeventyThree(s).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 11/04/2024 2:35 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
Come on, Bob !
?
?
A logging program that works?
On 11/03/2024 4:27 PM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
So what is next step please ?
?
?
Congratulations on new one !
But here, that does not work¡
?
?
I logged a contact with F6EXV on 2m. I set PROP_MODE to SAT. I set SAT_NAME to QO-100. I looked at the DXCC_SATELLITE
award, there you are. Thanks for the ATNO (I dob't know what it means, but I hear people get very excited about their ATNOs). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 7:13 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
They are all logged that way¡
?
?
Look at page 389 of the help file. For a contact to be counted as a 'satellite' contact it must be logged with the
PROP_MODE field as "SAT", and the SAT_NAME field as "QO-100" (or whatever). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 4:01 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
Hi Gary
I re-installed L32 and now I do see this menu.
Now, another issue¡ I have worked roughly 65 countries on? QO-100, band 13cm.
L32, in the DXCC stat excel-like file, only shows ¡ one !
How come ?
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
You? need to right-click in the body of the logbook, on any QSO line - not the window title or the column headers.
Do you get that menu, something similar, or nothing at all?
Honor Roll &? checker
?
?
if you
Right click on the Logbook Page Window
- what do you see - as options ?.
|
Re: Stupid question - how to open search pane?
Send me an ADIF export file of some of your satellite QSOs, I will test it here. SeventyThree(s).
On 11/04/2024 2:35 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
?
?
Come on, Bob !
?
?
A logging program that works?
On 11/03/2024 4:27 PM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
So what is next step please ?
?
?
Congratulations on new one !
But here, that does not work¡
?
?
I logged a contact with F6EXV on 2m. I set PROP_MODE to SAT. I set SAT_NAME to QO-100. I looked at the DXCC_SATELLITE award, there you are. Thanks for the ATNO (I dob't know what it means, but I hear people get very excited about their ATNOs). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 7:13 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
They are all logged that way¡
?
?
Look at page 389 of the help file. For a contact to be counted as a 'satellite' contact it must be logged with the PROP_MODE field as "SAT", and the SAT_NAME field as "QO-100" (or whatever). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 4:01 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
Hi Gary
I re-installed L32 and now I do see this menu.
Now, another issue¡ I have worked roughly 65 countries on? QO-100, band 13cm.
L32, in the DXCC stat excel-like file, only shows ¡ one !
How come ?
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
You? need to right-click in the body of the logbook, on any QSO line - not the window title or the column headers.
Do you get that menu, something similar, or nothing at all?
Honor Roll &? checker
?
?
if you Right click on the Logbook Page Window
- what do you see - as options ?.
|
Re: Stupid question - how to open search pane?
Paul
Did you try Tools-database maintenance-recalculate statistics or
rebuild logbook??
73
Jan
PA4JJ
Op 4-11-2024 om 08:35 schreef Paul
F6EXV:
Come
on, Bob !
?
?
A
logging program that works?
On 11/03/2024 4:27 PM EST Paul F6EXV
<f6exv@...> wrote:
So what is next step
please ?
?
?
Congratulations on
new one !
But here, that does
not work¡
?
?
I
logged a contact with F6EXV on 2m. I set PROP_MODE to
SAT. I set SAT_NAME to QO-100. I looked at the
DXCC_SATELLITE award, there you are. Thanks for the
ATNO (I dob't know what it means, but I hear people
get very excited about their ATNOs). SeventyThree(s).
On
11/03/2024 7:13 AM EST Paul F6EXV
<f6exv@...> wrote:
They are all
logged that way¡
?
?
Look
at page 389 of the help file. For a contact to be
counted as a 'satellite' contact it must be logged
with the PROP_MODE field as "SAT", and the
SAT_NAME field as "QO-100" (or whatever).
SeventyThree(s).
On
11/03/2024 4:01 AM EST Paul F6EXV
<f6exv@...> wrote:
Hi Gary
I
re-installed L32 and now I do see this menu.
Now, another
issue¡ I have worked roughly 65 countries on?
QO-100, band 13cm.
L32, in the
DXCC stat excel-like file, only shows ¡ one !
How come ?
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
You?
need to right-click in the body of the logbook,
on any QSO line - not the window title or the
column headers.
Do
you get that menu, something similar,
or nothing at all?
Honor Roll &? checker
?
?
if
you
Right
click on the Logbook Page Window
- what do you see -
as options ?.
--
____________________________________________________
my dxspider clusters running on a raspberry pi:
pa4jj-2 77.174.195.163 port 7300
pa4jj-3 77.174.195.163 port 7388
|
Re: LotW Sent-Flags not set after uploading
That checkbox has allways been there...
73
Jan PA4JJ
Op 4-11-2024 om 00:27 schreef Lorenz
Grassl, DL8RDL via groups.io:
Am 04.11.2024 um 00:10 schrieb
ja1nlx:
I checked this with the latest Logger32 and
LogSync.
LoTW QSL Sent flag are set correctly.
Even now I paid another, closer look to the GUI of LogSync?s
"LotW-area". I saw an important change: in this new version
2.0.19.8 now there?s a checkbox which has to be checked if the
user wants to have the "Sent to" flags updated in L32. That was
one I did not expect. I?m sure it will work next time. I will set
my 60 flags manually and everything will be fine.
TNX to all who thought already about that.
73 de Lenz,
DL8RDL
PS: TQSL is also the latest version, was updated yesterday
On 2024-11-04
ÔÂê×ÈÕ 7:46:43, Lorenz Grassl, DL8RDL via groups.io <mailingliste2@...>
wrote:
Hi to
all those L32-users!
My setup:
- L32 .329 (latest version)
LogSync 2.0.19.8 (latest version)
Today I observed the following behaviour:
I uploaded about 60 QSOs to LotW and as usual, L32 asked
his usual question concerning the "LotW-flags" (remove
the "send" and add the "sent to" flags). As usual I
clicked "OK" and rather quick the LogSync-Utility said:
"upload complete". "That was quick!" I thought and
waited for the "single QSO-action" (handling each QSO
seperately while uploading) while uploading to LotW we
saw the last year or so. But: there was no seperate
QSO-handling anymore! The "send to LotW"-flag was
removed from the QSOs BUT: no "sent to LotW"-flag was
set.
Then I looked up my QSOs at LotW and found all my
uploaded QSOs there. So far, so good! Obviously
everything went fine and very quick. Except setting the
"ent to LotW"-flags in L32. At LotW I saw, that one of
those 60 new QSOs was already QSLd and I downloaded my
single QSL from LotW using LogSync. This and the import
into L32 worked fine AND: in this particular QSO the
flags "LotW received" and "lotW-Sent"-flag in L32 were
set correctly then.
Three questions:
1. Is there an issue between the latest LogSync-version
and L32?
2. what?s the best practice to set 60 "Sent to
LotW"-flags to "Y"? (except from doing it manually 60
times) ? ;-)
3. is there a change at LotW which doesn?t make it
neccessary anymore to handle each QSO seperately as it
was the last year (or maybe longer)?
73 and tnx for your thoughts concerning this issue de
Lenz,
DL8RDL
--
____________________________________________________
my dxspider clusters running on a raspberry pi:
pa4jj-2 77.174.195.163 port 7300
pa4jj-3 77.174.195.163 port 7388
|
Re: Stupid question - how to open search pane?
Come on, Bob !
?
?
A logging program that works?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 11/03/2024 4:27 PM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
So what is next step please ?
?
?
Congratulations on new one !
But here, that does not work¡
?
?
I logged a contact with F6EXV on 2m. I set PROP_MODE to SAT. I set SAT_NAME to QO-100. I looked at the DXCC_SATELLITE
award, there you are. Thanks for the ATNO (I dob't know what it means, but I hear people get very excited about their ATNOs). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 7:13 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
They are all logged that way¡
?
?
Look at page 389 of the help file. For a contact to be counted as a 'satellite' contact it must be logged with the
PROP_MODE field as "SAT", and the SAT_NAME field as "QO-100" (or whatever). SeventyThree(s).
On 11/03/2024 4:01 AM EST Paul F6EXV <f6exv@...> wrote:
Hi Gary
I re-installed L32 and now I do see this menu.
Now, another issue¡ I have worked roughly 65 countries on? QO-100, band 13cm.
L32, in the DXCC stat excel-like file, only shows ¡ one !
How come ?
?
73
Paul F6EXV
?
?
You? need to right-click in the body of the logbook, on any QSO line - not the window title or the column headers.
Do you get that menu, something similar, or nothing at all?
Honor Roll &? checker
?
?
if you
Right click on the Logbook Page Window
- what do you see - as options ?.
|
Re: LotW Sent-Flags not set after uploading
Am 04.11.2024 um 00:10 schrieb ja1nlx:
I checked this with the latest Logger32 and LogSync.
LoTW QSL Sent flag are set correctly.
Even now I paid another, closer look to the GUI of LogSync?s
"LotW-area". I saw an important change: in this new version 2.0.19.8
now there?s a checkbox which has to be checked if the user wants to
have the "Sent to" flags updated in L32. That was one I did not
expect. I?m sure it will work next time. I will set my 60 flags
manually and everything will be fine.
TNX to all who thought already about that.
73 de Lenz,
DL8RDL
PS: TQSL is also the latest version, was updated yesterday
On 2024-11-04
ÔÂê×ÈÕ 7:46:43, Lorenz Grassl, DL8RDL via groups.io <mailingliste2@...>
wrote:
Hi to
all those L32-users!
My setup:
- L32 .329 (latest version)
LogSync 2.0.19.8 (latest version)
Today I observed the following behaviour:
I uploaded about 60 QSOs to LotW and as usual, L32 asked
his usual question concerning the "LotW-flags" (remove the
"send" and add the "sent to" flags). As usual I clicked
"OK" and rather quick the LogSync-Utility said: "upload
complete". "That was quick!" I thought and waited for the
"single QSO-action" (handling each QSO seperately while
uploading) while uploading to LotW we saw the last year or
so. But: there was no seperate QSO-handling anymore! The
"send to LotW"-flag was removed from the QSOs BUT: no
"sent to LotW"-flag was set.
Then I looked up my QSOs at LotW and found all my uploaded
QSOs there. So far, so good! Obviously everything went
fine and very quick. Except setting the "ent to
LotW"-flags in L32. At LotW I saw, that one of those 60
new QSOs was already QSLd and I downloaded my single QSL
from LotW using LogSync. This and the import into L32
worked fine AND: in this particular QSO the flags "LotW
received" and "lotW-Sent"-flag in L32 were set correctly
then.
Three questions:
1. Is there an issue between the latest LogSync-version
and L32?
2. what?s the best practice to set 60 "Sent to LotW"-flags
to "Y"? (except from doing it manually 60 times) ? ;-)
3. is there a change at LotW which doesn?t make it
neccessary anymore to handle each QSO seperately as it was
the last year (or maybe longer)?
73 and tnx for your thoughts concerning this issue de
Lenz,
DL8RDL
|
Re: LotW Sent-Flags not set after uploading
and someone reported before that the similar problem solved when TQSL was updated.
On 2024-11-04 ÔÂê×ÈÕ 8:10:11, ja1nlx via groups.io <ayoshida0205@...> wrote:
I checked this with the latest Logger32 and LogSync. LoTW QSL Sent flag are set correctly.
On 2024-11-04 ÔÂê×ÈÕ 7:46:43, Lorenz Grassl, DL8RDL via groups.io <mailingliste2@...> wrote:
Hi to all those L32-users!
My setup:
- L32 .329 (latest version)
LogSync 2.0.19.8 (latest version)
Today I observed the following behaviour:
I uploaded about 60 QSOs to LotW and as usual, L32 asked his usual
question concerning the "LotW-flags" (remove the "send" and add the
"sent to" flags). As usual I clicked "OK" and rather quick the
LogSync-Utility said: "upload complete". "That was quick!" I thought
and waited for the "single QSO-action" (handling each QSO seperately
while uploading) while uploading to LotW we saw the last year or so.
But: there was no seperate QSO-handling anymore! The "send to
LotW"-flag was removed from the QSOs BUT: no "sent to LotW"-flag was
set.
Then I looked up my QSOs at LotW and found all my uploaded QSOs
there. So far, so good! Obviously everything went fine and very
quick. Except setting the "ent to LotW"-flags in L32. At LotW I saw,
that one of those 60 new QSOs was already QSLd and I downloaded my
single QSL from LotW using LogSync. This and the import into L32
worked fine AND: in this particular QSO the flags "LotW received"
and "lotW-Sent"-flag in L32 were set correctly then.
Three questions:
1. Is there an issue between the latest LogSync-version and L32?
2. what?s the best practice to set 60 "Sent to LotW"-flags to "Y"?
(except from doing it manually 60 times) ? ;-)
3. is there a change at LotW which doesn?t make it neccessary
anymore to handle each QSO seperately as it was the last year (or
maybe longer)?
73 and tnx for your thoughts concerning this issue de Lenz,
DL8RDL
|
Re: LotW Sent-Flags not set after uploading
I checked this with the latest Logger32 and LogSync. LoTW QSL Sent flag are set correctly.
On 2024-11-04 ÔÂê×ÈÕ 7:46:43, Lorenz Grassl, DL8RDL via groups.io <mailingliste2@...> wrote:
Hi to all those L32-users!
My setup:
- L32 .329 (latest version)
LogSync 2.0.19.8 (latest version)
Today I observed the following behaviour:
I uploaded about 60 QSOs to LotW and as usual, L32 asked his usual
question concerning the "LotW-flags" (remove the "send" and add the
"sent to" flags). As usual I clicked "OK" and rather quick the
LogSync-Utility said: "upload complete". "That was quick!" I thought
and waited for the "single QSO-action" (handling each QSO seperately
while uploading) while uploading to LotW we saw the last year or so.
But: there was no seperate QSO-handling anymore! The "send to
LotW"-flag was removed from the QSOs BUT: no "sent to LotW"-flag was
set.
Then I looked up my QSOs at LotW and found all my uploaded QSOs
there. So far, so good! Obviously everything went fine and very
quick. Except setting the "ent to LotW"-flags in L32. At LotW I saw,
that one of those 60 new QSOs was already QSLd and I downloaded my
single QSL from LotW using LogSync. This and the import into L32
worked fine AND: in this particular QSO the flags "LotW received"
and "lotW-Sent"-flag in L32 were set correctly then.
Three questions:
1. Is there an issue between the latest LogSync-version and L32?
2. what?s the best practice to set 60 "Sent to LotW"-flags to "Y"?
(except from doing it manually 60 times) ? ;-)
3. is there a change at LotW which doesn?t make it neccessary
anymore to handle each QSO seperately as it was the last year (or
maybe longer)?
73 and tnx for your thoughts concerning this issue de Lenz,
DL8RDL
|
Gerald Boutin
ZL2iFB
HB9DDS
Jan