开云体育

just wondering how you charge it without the usb socket?

sorry about all the caps,didnt realise untill i had hit the post tab,didnt mean to be rude.

Hi NanoVNAuser Out of the box it is 0 Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af nanovnauser@... Sendt: 19. december

Yes I would like to know how to upgrade the firmware.? I know there is a dongle from ST that will do it.? This nano has had the USB connector removed.? I would like to solder it back but it's too

Gabriel. change of screen rotation is just a trivial edit of one line in the setup section of the code.

tHANKS KURT,WHAT SHOULD THE DELAY BE OUT OF THE BOX?,AS IVE MESSED WITH MINE BEFORE,I CAN SET IT TO ORIGINAL AND WORK FROM THERE,I DIDNT MALE A NOTE BEFORE I CHANGED IT! 73 pAUL

From some hobbyist market sales I've been involved with, at least in the U.S. the second psychological price barrier is $100 -- three digits tends to scare people off.? (The first barrier seems to be

Hi, Mike Thanks for the advice, and I will take this on board. I have a general dimensioned drawing of one, and I think when I start looking at possible design’s, I would ask our members to download

FWIW I haven't printed hagster's design but have printed cases for my two NanoVNAs and one for a friend, based on the design by VK5ZBR. Unfortunately every one had to be different due to physical

Hi NanoVNAuser Yuo explanation is not very clear and picture a bit fuzzy. But iyt might be you need to introduce a delay via Display/Scale/Electrical delay Kind regard Kurt -----Oprindelig

I have to agree with this, I have a NanoVNA-F and I use it a lot more than the smaller model purely because I can see it. I would be happy to pay extra for a bigger display and as a consequence a

Can you switch off the calibration and do a full range scan with nothing connected. This will show if there is a hw problem -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files:

Hi Bob, a general point: Some (early?) firmware versions for the NanoVNA "only" allowed operation up to 900 MHz. I suspect you have one of those - and that you will need to upgrade your firmware in

Hi Bob, It is true that when one has several hours, one does not know the exact time. Anyone with multiple VNAs doesn't know which one is accurate - maybe because everything is relative? :-) :-) :-)

no ideas on this then folks?

Without display user define sweep points useful. Raw data also interesting or/and better calibration model on instrument. Currently no way to define precision oslt model on nanova. Many times coaxial

YES IT IS HF,73

The firmware can be configured for up to 201 points, but there are still a few minor UI glitches we need to fix before this can be advertised. Sweep rate is by default 100 points/s, and this is what

#86": Two Notes On #86': UPGRADE : On the Results of Measuring Two-Ports Using Only [NanoVNA] Channel [CH0] or a [LeastVNA] 16 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8278 Note 1 At

@Gary O'Neil, N3GO - 18 December 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/8386 Dear Gary, Thank you for the interesting suggestions. We will prepare and send you two copies - the one with