|
I have to agree with this, I have a NanoVNA-F and I use it a lot more than the smaller model purely because I can see it. I would be happy to pay extra for a bigger display and as a consequence a bigger battery. I do not know how many units you need to sell and at what profit to make any project viable but a 3GHz VNA 5 inch display would be worth $180-200. I think that you can sell several hundred units at that price point.
People with disposable income in this hobby tend to be older and tend to have failing eyesight. A big display is very important. Regards Conrad PA5Y ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd via Groups.Io <drkirkby@...> Sent: 17 December 2019 23:43 To: nanovna-users <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] First PCB pictures of the V2 On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 20:45, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:40 AM, Dale Parfitt wrote:I would also like to add my voice to the many that would want to purchase this with a larger screen. How does the larger screen you may or may note use compare with the 4.3" on the NanoVNA-F? The 4.3" of the -F is more attractive than 4" for obvious reasons, but how about pixel count, and other technical features about the screen. I don't know if I'm unusual, but for me, the screen is more important than the pure performance, as great performance is no use if you can't see the blinking thing. Of course, if you are going to use it in a lab, with a PC interface, the screen is pretty irrelevant. But there seem to be enough people wanting a decent screen. The 6.5" on my iPhone XS max would be nice. Ouch, that phone was ?1250, so it's not a fair comparison! But seriously, size matters. ????? |
