开云体育

[#97]

On our Comparison of our [NanoVNA] with our [HP 8505A]
Using the Ultimate Criterion of Cross-Ratios

Dear all,

It is our great pleasure and honor to present to you our
results - which we just got for the very first time - of our
Comparison of our [NanoVNA] with our [HP 8505A] Using
the Ultimate Criterion of Cross-Ratios [#96].

We hope that the Great Significance of these results shall be
made crystal clear as soon as you will take into account that
the

* T h e o r e t i c a l * E x a c t * V a l u e *

of this ratio of cross-ratios is:

Modulus = 1

Argument = 0

while, comparatively to this Exact Value,

our * E x p e r i m e n t a l * R e s u l t s * are:

Modulus : Min = 0.98 and Max = 1.01

Argument : Min = -0.07 and Max = 2.10 - in Degrees,

at those, previously mentioned [#95.3], eight 8 frequencies,
as follows:

Modulus:


Argument:


Finally, allow us, please, to additionally emphasize that
these results are substantially independent [#96] of the
four loads we used, that is of their nominal values and
of their uncertainties, this comparison regards both of our:

[NanoVNA] and [HP 8505A]

* p e r * s e * .

We wish you a Happy New Year 2020 !

Sincerely yours,

gin&pez@arg

REFERENCES

[#96]:The Ultimate Criterion for Endless Reliable VNA Comparisons
28 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8749

[#95.3]: On the Sufficient Conditions for Identical Measurements Using
Two Substantially Different VNAs - Our Research has been Completed
27 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8669

[97#]