On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:19 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
So that really does push one to say "NanoVNA-Saver" should send a "cal
off" command before sweeping, if you're doing cal within NanoVNA-Saver.
As I mentioned earlier the calibration routines in NanoVNA Saver depend on having calibrated input over a wide range from the NanoVNA according to Rune. This may be because the algorithm used in Saver does not do much bounds checking and would not work well with raw data. I have had instances where Saver just aborts at the conclusion of a cal routine and I have to start all over gain. I have never had this problem with the NanoVNA app by OneOflEleven.
Roger
Roger Need