开云体育

FCC Restricted Bands (Part 15.205) is likely to be relevant, where the requirement is equivalent to -41.2dBm/MHz eirp (assuming a 0dBi antenna), -41.2dBm/100kHz 960MHz-1GHz, and -49dBm/100kHz at lower

Alternative suggestion give them ear plugs. Ha ha De K8HTB Joe

It could be an artifact of how scikit-rf works or how NanoVNA-Saver is coded. For example, the uncalibrated nanovna returns gamma for ch0 as reflected measurement/source measurement It's easy to

Hello Kent, Mark introduced himself as an 'RF newbie' and I was, somewhat clumsily, trying to point out that transmitting RF is not an unregulated activity. I understand that very low power CW

Amateur radio transmissions require id, as do broadcasts (both are for the purposes of "communication") but other transmissions generally do not (radars don't ID).? As it happens radars aren't legal

DisLord, First, THANKS for all your efforts!! You guys do an amazing job, I want to make sure my comments are not taken as I think people are not working hard….. ;-). I’m only trying to offer my

Hi Norman On this side of the pond the FCC does recognize the need to radiate signals during testing. I have an antenna range and commonly transmit on many commercial frequencies.? I am expected to

What I don't understand: If 'weird' measurements can be handled/calibrated with code in the NanoVNA (which is a smallish device), why would it not be possible to have proper calibration, without

Good afternoon Mark, In most parts of the world, transmitting a radio frequency signal is a carefully regulated and licensed activity, whether for experimentation or any other purpose. Holders of

On 10/6/21 7:11 AM, Jim Lux wrote: > On 10/6/21 3:36 AM, msat via groups.io wrote: >> Hello everyone! >> >> RF newbie and first time poster here. Recently purchased a NanoVNA-H for a specific

On 10/6/21 3:36 AM, msat via groups.io wrote: > Hello everyone! > > RF newbie and first time poster here. Recently purchased a NanoVNA-H for a specific experiment I'd like to perform. Without going

Hello everyone! RF newbie and first time poster here. Recently purchased a NanoVNA-H for a specific experiment I'd like to perform. Without going into the unnecessary details of the experiment itself,

Your radios/equipment might look good if cleaned ;)

Since the transducer/speaker is small with an even smaller opening, you can open the case and place a piece of masking tape over the opening. That will greatly reduce the level.? On Tue., 5 Oct. 2021

Interesting.. maybe it doesn't handle reflection coefficients with mag > 1 or something. That could easily happen if it's uncalibrated, since it's just returning reflection/source, and the gains of

As I mentioned earlier the calibration routines in NanoVNA Saver depend on having calibrated input over a wide range from the NanoVNA according to Rune. This may be because the algorithm used in Saver

G'day all, I have the F version 1.0.3 up and running. Is there any way to disable the audio when the VNA is turned on and each time a calibration button selection (e.g., Open, Short, Load)? I hope so

So that really does push one to say "NanoVNA-Saver" should send a "cal off" command before sweeping, if you're doing cal within NanoVNA-Saver.

I create this case for my 4 inch nanoVNA v2: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4727705 it contain stick holder, and box for calibration kit, not big.

Thanks DiSlord for explanation, I understand. Op di 5 okt. 2021 om 20:13 schreef DiSlord <dislordlive@...>: