Note, with clearer screen captures:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
50-ohm cal: S11 reads 304.88 ohms real as a folded dipole shoud (on the right of the chart right where it sould be for 300- ohms real) 300-ohm cal: S11 reads 53.5 ohms (in the center of the chart since you have reset the cal position with a 300 ohm cal) Also note that 53.5 ohms X 6 = 321-ohms, very close to what you measured with the 50-ohm cal. This is how a normalized chart works when calibrated to something other than 50-ohms. You could just as well have taken the chart center as 1, or unity. With a 50-ohm cal, the center becomes 50-ohms. With a 300-ohm cal, the center becomes 300-ohms. The values in a normalized chart must be multiplied by the system impedance of the cal. This is a good method to make more meaningful measurements when dealing with extremely low and extremely high impedances. However, the ultimate limitation will always be the bridge or the directional coupler within the measurement instrument. The HP 8753 uses a very carefully designed and meticulously machined directional coupler to accomplish its published specifications (the HP 85047 S-Parameter Test Set mated with the 8753). I am continuously amazed at how well the little NANOVNA (and all its variants - minus some clones) compare to this very expensive piece of HP test gear! Credit to the engineers who made it happen!!!!!! As far as the additional dips in SWR, the antenna must be in free space to show only resonances (the horizontal axis on the Smith Chart). Resonance is defined as +jX = -jX, leaving nothing but real resistance which, for an antenna, is the sum of ohmic losses in the conductors which make up the antenna and the radiation resistance which is a 'magic' result of all things electromagnetic ?? (you don't really want to know- *lots* of calculus). The higher in frequency you go, the smaller geometries become, and the easier it is to test in something resembling 'free space'. At FM broadcast frequencies, its rather difficult without a semi-anechoic chamber in which to test (read, lots of $$$$$$). Dave - W?LEV On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:04 PM goscickiw <goscickiw@...> wrote:
Thanks, so the only thing I should do is to multiply the --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* *Just Think* |