¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Question for SEE Finance users? #AppleSoftware


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý



On Oct 21, 2019, at 7:31 PM, jimrobertson via Groups.Io <jimrobertson@...> wrote:

Just now I looked at the same task (launching SEE Finance) on my late 2016 15¡± Quad Core i7 MacBook Pro 2.7 GHz , 16 GBytes RAM, 512 GB internal SSD. The program loaded completely in 10 seconds, and occupied about 850 MB of RAM when it was finished loading. That¡¯s a comparable space to what¡¯s committed on the iMac, where my swap file is twice the size and the total available RAM is half as much.

So, I suspect more RAM might help. I¡¯ll contact the developer for verification or other ideas.

The Scimonoce Software folks answered my inquiry about the slow launch times of SEE Finance and acknowledged that it does load its entire database into RAM at launch. However, I¡¯ve discovered a few other oddities that puzzle me.

  1. If I have a bunch of apps open on the 1 TB Fusion-Drive, 8 GB RAM iMac, so that the RAM in use shown by Activity Monitor is about 7 GB and the swap file is > 1 GB, then launch SEE Finance for the first time in awhile, it can take 50 seconds to open its first account window (there¡¯s a ¡°Loading¡± flash screen displayed until then).
  2. Here¡¯s what¡¯s weird: if immediately, I quit from SEE Finance, then launch it again, it only takes about 10 seconds to load and display the same account window.
  3. Here¡¯s what¡¯s even MORE weird. If I reboot the iMac and make sure that the only app with a user controlled interface that autolaunches is Activity Monitor, launching SEE Finance (with less than 4 GB of RAM in use) again takes 50 seconds for first launch, 10 seconds for relaunch.

I¡¯m guessing (wildly guessing) that there are two bumps in the road to launch. One is probably the 8 GB of total RAM; the second may be the Fusion Drive, and how/where the OS puts stuff (rotating platter vs the very small SSD that¡¯s part of the Fusion drive) when I launch the app.

Despite the videos I¡¯ve watched regarding upgrading the innards of a 21.5 inch iMac (which should be accompanied by the March to the Gallows Scherzo from Berlioz¡¯s Symphonie Fantastique as a soundtrack), I think I might take that leap, but I certainly won¡¯t tell my wife first! While I¡¯m in there, if it¡¯s possible I¡¯ll swap out the Fusion Drive and replace it with a fast SSD.

If no one hears from me for a few days, you¡¯ll know what I¡¯m doing (but it won¡¯t be now; I¡¯ll give fellow list members plenty of time to try to talk me out of it).

The curious cat in me will also want to experiment a bit to see which wrinkle in the architecture of my iMac is the greater impediment to full-throttle performance (RAM limitation or Fusion Drive). To sort that out, I think I¡¯d have to do the upgrades separately from each other, but I certainly don¡¯t want to peel that 4K display off the front of the so-thin chassis twice. I have an external monitor; does anyone know if the iMac can be operated without the screen in place hiding its internal organs?

Jim Robertson

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.