On Dec 28, 2024, at 11:53?AM, jimrobertson via groups.io <jimrobertson@...> wrote:
I do have one other weapon to deploy here, however. My spouse¡¯s Christmas ¡°haul¡± includes a brand new M3 MacBook Air that I¡¯m setting up for her (not as rapidly as she¡¯d like). It arrived a month or so ago running Sonoma 14.6 and Safari 17.6, so I¡¯ll ¡°feed¡± it a bit of leitesculinaria while I bicycle to nowhere on my indoor trainer and see what happens.
And doing THAT just adds to my confusion, because here¡¯s what Activity Monitor tells me on my laptop after just it sat undisturbed with the culinary website open for about 1.5 hours while I toiled away on my indoor bike for an hour:
Immediately adjacent, my spouse¡¯s brand new machine, unburdened by ¡°memories¡± of the tasks of just over a year of daily use, managed to corral the RAM requested by the analogous process to a remarkably stable 1.27 GB, although paradoxically Activity Monitor DID report its ¡°Real Memory Size¡± to be actually LARGER than on my machine.
What I¡¯m concluding from this is that it¡¯s not macOS all by itself that is causing this misbehavior, but something that¡¯s happened along the way that I¡¯ll probably never ferret out, and it leads me to infer that before I update to Sequoia it might BE prudent to do a data-disk-only backup of my Mac in SuperDuper! and then an erase and restore Sequoia installation of the System volume. Does that make sense?
--?
Jim Robertson