You are most welcome! ?
One WANTS a negative result - I was simply showing what you should get as a result if you have no infection(s).
D.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 29 Nov 2023, at 20:29, J_Catlady <JanetOliviaCatlady@...> wrote:
In that case there¡¯s no significance to your negative result. ?? But thanks for all the info!
On Nov 29, 2023, at 12:08?PM, David G Brooks via groups.io <davidandtrishab@...> wrote:
?Hi Janet
I found the detail about the fake warning on-line. I have never had it myself. I posted it for your information.
Malwarebytes has been in my toolbox, as it were, since its inception - 2008 IIRC.
Apple Support recommends the use of Malwarebytes.
It¡¯s your call now!
David.
On 29 Nov 2023, at 19:59, J_Catlady <JanetOliviaCatlady@...> wrote:
But did you also get the fake warning? I thought you just found that online somewhere and posted it here for my information. If you got it, and your malwarebytes scan found nothing, I¡¯m going to trust Sophos also having found nothing in both the quick and full versions of their scan.
Thanks!
On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:54?AM, David G Brooks via groups.io <davidandtrishab@...> wrote:
?After I¡¯d email you, Janet, I downloaded, installed and ran Malwarebytes.
Here¡¯s a screenshot of my result:-
I hope this helps and that you get a similar result!
David
<Screenshot 2023-11-29 at 19.49.19.png>
--
Janet
--
Janet
David G Brooks