开云体育

This list is only for PCB board houses right? Is there any for assembly houses (that's what he was asking for). I recommended him to check http://www.madritonic.es (from Spain), they have good BGA

There is at least one in Belgrade. //Dan, M0DFI Aurel Cristescu <aurelcristescu@...> wrote:

I think there are a couple European ones listed at : http://wiki.xtronics.com/index.php/Gerbview#PCB_Board_houses If you find some more - please add them to the list ( with a note that they are in

I forgot to mention that i am located in romania. I had some previous project resolved with a bulgarian company but they cannot place bga.s.

Hi Aurel, tell me about your design at miguelangel@... and I could suggest you some houses depending on the target price and design complexity. Greetings, Mike! 2012/6/14 aurelcristescu

Hi. Does anyone know a pcb assembly house with low cost and bga cappability (1mm) in europe? This is of course for few protos and maybe small run later. Thanks.

Richard <r-haldemann@...> wrote: Glad to help Richard! //dan

Hi Dan I deleted all board outline and put it in again and it worked. Thanks for your help. Richard

Richard, Magnify your design and look for unconnected "dots" or very very short tracks. This happens sometimes when you have an undeleted track segment left. These track segments can be extremely

Hi all I have successfully created a schematics including all libs for schema and footprints then placed the components on a board. Then I tried the manual router but as my board is quite dense I

don't recall seeing dashed line getting inside envelope of a transistor or junctions of each electrode to envelope (E, B, C). ________________________________ To: kicad-users@... Sent:

Actually Karl I've got quite a few products out of the door in my time. Mostly I have not troubled myself too much over schematic symbols so long as they are comprehensible to me (which is not always

Likewise most circuits I have show a circle. Personally I don't really care, a transistor is a transistor regardless; Easy enough to tell what is it with or without, or for that matter with lines

I would go with standard usage instead being dogmatic to the standard. The circle takes up room - and is just visual noise today - haven't seen it used outside of academia for a long time. Much more

Hi Robert, ?You're absolutely right about the use of the envelope - at least for the last standards I had in hand.? (Bernd, can you check what your copy of the standard says about the envelope?) The

Hi Robert, ?Take Bernd's? advice regarding the circles since he has a copy of the standard.? (The last copy I had is so old that the circle only denoted the physical envelope, not necessarily a

>________________________________ > From: Robert <birmingham_spider@...> >To: kicad-users@... >Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:10 PM >Subject: Re: [kicad-users] Re: Comments About

Hi Bernd,? Gee I did see it many times in the past 25 years ago but I was always focussed on doing things rather than keeping track on trivia and standards. Now you made me dust off my old books to

Hello Ivica. Nice to know and would make sense. Can you give me a point to the official source of this statement? I want to discuss it with the local EN-standard supplier here, because the lack of

circle on transistor symbol is used to indicate that this is discrete component (individually packaged transistor - has nothing to do with form or shape of package). transistors without circle