Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Digitalhobbyist
- Messages
Search
Richard
Do you have a gear ratio between motor and spindle? Do you have high and
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
low gear?? If you do the motor option is a No-No. The encoder counts are entered as a constant in the software so could be changed however I would take a good look at the software before you go that route. Richard On 22/08/2019 15:45, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
Thanks Charlie, that is what I was guessing. I am "thinking" of using |
||
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
I am "thinking" of using a optical disk I could pretty easily do 100 holesHi, Ralph, Is it possible?? Yes.? Is it worth your time?? The encoder I used cost around $15, so I would vote "no" if it was me, but to each his own.? Putting it on the motor shaft could be advantageous; you would have to determine how the number of pulses converted to spindle rotations.? It might be possible to use the AMT102-V encoder... you would have to isolate it mechanically because it won't take any radial load, but it would likely be possible. ? John or Richard could answer this question better, but I am fairly certain that you can enter the number of pulses per revolution in the software. -- Regards, Charlie New Jersey, USA |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
I used DC gear motors for power feeds on a few of my machines, including a worm drive car windshield wiper motor for the X axis on my Atlas mill, which is maybe half or two-thirds the size of your Clausing. I think you saw it on homemadetools.net. I don¡¯t know the specs of the motor - I use it all the time, but it¡¯s not really strong enough for roughing cuts.
?
Mounting it was at least as much work as it was the Z axis stepper for my ¡°Russian ELS¡± and maybe twice as much when you include the simple clutch. It would be unusable without that.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:20 AM, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
|
||
Thanks Charlie, that is what I was guessing. I am "thinking" of using a optical disk I could pretty easily do 100 holes doing more would get tedious, and I am "thinking" of putting the encoder on the motor shaft, is there a? way to input pulse per rev in the controller? I have some CUI Inc. encoders. Ralph On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:27 PM CLevinski <clevinski@...> wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:41 PM, Ralph Hulslander wrote: --
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
#CNC
Yes the Consew motor drives the spindle. I do not want/need full CNC just motorized lead screws with automation. Other retros I have seen had the Y motor below the table with a pulley, that is why I wonder if the referenced X motor might?work it has the motor below. It seemed adapting that might be easier that building from scratch. Thanks John and everyone for the help, I sure need it. Ralph On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:52 AM John Lindo <bechetboat@...> wrote: The consew motor is on the head not the X axis. ?? --
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
I have seen some people used electric drills, so I am confused on how big of a motor is needed. It would not take a big motor to move the table, except for Z that might take a bigger motor. But it would take more power when making a cut.? I suppose I will just have to try various motors to see what works, I'll integrate a amp meter into the controls to make comparisons.? Now I Just need some snow on the ground so that I can get into my shop. Thanks again everyone. Ralph ? On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:36 PM Ralph Hulslander via Groups.Io <rhulslander=[email protected]> wrote:
--
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
#CNC
The consew motor is on the head not the X axis. ??
Any chance of photos of your machine, this would help I am sure to see what you actually have. Thanks -- John |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
#CNC
RAlph.
Very nice machine thanks for sharing. IMHO this machine would not be a good candidate for CNC retrofit because of the following reasons. The X axis is not much of an issue, stepper connected either by direct drive or flexible coupling to the feed/lead screw. Motor bracket fixed onto the end of the table, stepper motor attached using stand offs if necessary. Y axis you could also use a stepper with a belt drive to the lead screw and tuck the assembly under the table, IE a pulley is attached to the front end of the screw, belt driven with a pulley on the end of the stepper, if direct drive, it would mean the stepper sticking out the front. I dont think you could drive the Y axis screw from the back (column end) as the table in Z moves up and down. The Z axis ( milling machine knee) again IMHO could be a major concern for any type power feed. Guessing you have a graduated dia on a shaft that is fitted on the other end with a bevel gear the turns the main screw to lift and or lower the table. Adding any form of power feed may mean a huge motor and then backlash of the screws could be an issue, normally on knee type machines the knee is locked after positioning the up/down and the quill is used in the head for cutting final Z depths, but not all the time. Most CNC milling machines have the Z axis controlled by a fixed head or possibly driving the quill up and down. in your case it would be the quill., again not impossible but a tremendous amount of work to retrofit.the head with some type of feedscrew. Richard UK did a fantastic job of fitting a powered ball screw to his Sieg mini mill, and basically removed the rack and pinion? which has always been a bone of contention. Trying to keep this post short, 70% of milling operations ( or hand cranking) is done using the X axis. It seems from your post you already have the X axis ( just guessing) with power feed, Consew motor, which does help the manual work some what. Currently I cannot help much more, but I am sure we have forum members with more experience than me to offer more recommendations. Your final goal I know is to reduce the amount of manual table movements, again IMHO CNC / Clausing are not compatible. Thanks -- John |
||
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:41 PM, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
Charlie, and others. Why the spindle encoder? Is a multicount required to get the spindle speed?Hi, Ralph, The spindle encoder is crucial so the ELS controller "knows" how fast to drive the lead screw at any given instant.? I usually thread now using a hand crank; the change gears ensure that the lead screw turns at the right speed to match my spindle speed.? But without the gears, how is the lead screw speed to be determined?? In ELS, it is calculated by the controller as a specific ratio of lead screw RPM to spindle RPM.? The encoder is how we determine spindle RPM so we can set lead screw RPM. In general, (and I believe in this case), the fewer pulses per revolution, the more that you are seeing an average RPM, rather than an accurate, almost instantaneous one.? This is fine if all you are doing is reading the RPM on a display.? But with ELS and a very low count encoder, the spindle might be able to make a significant change in speed before the processor "knows" about it (because it cannot update more often than once per pulse), and can adjust the lead screw and or cross-slide motors to match.? This would result in uneven threads and poorer finishes. At least, this is my understanding with the current implementation. ? -- Regards, Charlie New Jersey, USA |
||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýNice! ? Greg ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Lindo
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [digitalhobbyist] Gear reduction 3D printed bracket. ? Numbers are 2092 and 2095. ? Good on LMS. a brilliant bunch of guys,? I printed in the past a 32 T and looks good ( involute wise) .See photo, LMS versus 3D print. A bit grubby, well so am I. LOL Never tried it yet, as what is currently running using LMS gears that I purchased 5 years works,is still running,? but for example if it?s a Sunday? morning,and you need to replace a GR gear, well just print it.???It?s what we have the machines for. But I just purchased more gears from Chris Woods, magic, but I don?t like the US postal charges, Gr 1111111111, every one is getting fat cept Momma Cass. I am in the process of putting together 5 more Real Bull GR units and I am supposed to be retired, or is it retarded, DON'T answer. Procrastination and we are all guilty of, is the thief of time? Enjoy the day, each second is precious. ? John ? ?
? On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 10:50, Fast Eddie <epinnell@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
Thanks that is why I asked! I do not want to turn dials. I do not need CNC, well at this point I do not need CNC. I just want motorized X, Y and Z. The I have outfitted DRO on all of the axis? and installed a . Ralph On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:00 PM Richard <edelec@...> wrote: Those are for the X axis feed on a mill. IMHO far too big for the --
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Thanks Charlie, that would be helpful! Now if I can just remember ... Ralph On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:04 PM CLevinski <clevinski@...> wrote:
--
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Charlie, and others. Why the spindle encoder? Is a multicount required to get the spindle speed? I have seen lots of RPM devices that used one pulse others got their accuracy with 8 pulses. So is 600 or 1200 or even 2400 pulses really required? Is there documentation on the software you are using? Ralph On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:58 AM MC Cason via Groups.Io <farmerboy1967=[email protected]> wrote:
--
Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Eddie All good information. Thanks.for sharing, I have a lot to learn and experiment. On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 20:16, Fast Eddie <epinnell@...> wrote:
--
John |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
Richard
Those are for the X axis feed on a mill. IMHO far too big for the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Clausing 8520. What do you want them for? You said X Y Z which indicates CNC. If so these are totally wrong, as are the geared motors you discussed. Richard On 21/08/2019 19:58, Ralph Hulslander wrote:
Should I use these type of motors |
||
Re: Need some help deciding ...
Hi Ralph.
I am unfamiliar with the Clausing mill. Any chance of a few photos.?. Can you remind us all the of your final game plan, thinking it is it to provide power feed to the 3 axis. I cannot picture in my head how you would attach "these motor" assemblies? to the Y and Z axis, originally designed for the X axis. For much less than 1/2 this total outlay,and with good CNC capabilities I suggest Nema 23 motors and DDCS V3.1 4 axis CNC control box with MPG "manual pulse generator".- This I think would give you 90% of all the milling work you need to do? be it manual or CNC. -- John |
||
Need some help deciding ...
Should I use for my Clausing X, Y and Z? Or should I just hacktogether some other odd motors? I do have some Gear Reduced Brusless DC motors top speed 18 rpm, also I do have one Brushless DC GR motor that came off a garage door opener I can't remeber the RPM.
Any ways are designed for a Bridgeport Mill so I would have to make some modifications, not sure why they would not work for Y and Z but are listed as for X. I hope this post is within the scope of the forum. Ralph? -- Clausing 8520, Craftsman 12x36 Lathe, 4x12 mini lathe, 14" Delta drill press, 40 watt laser, Consew brushless DC motors and a non working 3D printer |
||
Hi John!
I bought a couple of packages of 12"x12" mirror tiles and I was using those but it makes it hard to get a good picture from my camera with all the reflections. I sandblasted one of them a long time ago and I tried it but I don't remember what I didn't like about it. Ultimately I opted for a sheet of regular glass and cut it to the size I need, but I still have that sandblasted mirror tile so I'll give it another go. I was also going to suggest PETG for gears. Most of my filament is PETG. It's easy to use but it tends to be stringy and that's one of the reasons why I put a camera on the x-axis carriage a few months back. I've seen the filament bubbling at the tip of the nozzle with PETG before but didn't connect the dots as it being wet, and it still prints beautifully, so I would say that PETG doesn't absolutely need to be dried unless you are after maximum performance. But the Alloy 910...the first thing I noticed is that right after I changed filament, I extruded 150mm to flush out the hotend, but then it just kept extruding/oozing out of the nozzle. As I'm watching it, it looked like there were lumps in it. I always watch the first layer, all the way through...if I don't have an absolutely perfect first layer, I cancel the print and start over. The first layer looked lumpy, like the material hadn't melted completely. I dried it in the food dehydrator/filament dryer at max (150-160F) until the next day (about 18 hrs) and then fed it out of the dryer into the printer. I printed it while the dryer was running. I don't like to run the dryer in the room because it gets too hot in there after awhile so usually I put the dryer outside while drying, but I put up with it in this case. When it's dry it comes out of the nozzle just like creamy toothpaste. I didn't think I would like printing it with a raft, but the raft prints like a plush down comforter and peels away easily, leaving a nice surface finish. Speaking about surface finishes...I printed the CR-10s camera mount with support and it produces a woven kind of finish, not entirely unattractive... Here's the other side (Hatchbox Black PETG): #3D |
||
Eddie
?
Thanks for the information.
I have found the nearest supplier in France.?
Prices and shipping as one would expect.? ?
I found in the past when printing ABS , I sand (bead) blasted the
upper side of the glass to a frosted finish, not a heavy blast.
This seems to stop the corners from lifting during print.Also applied a so?ution of chopped up ABS?
and mixed with Acetone, mixed to a milk constituency and paint on the glass after preheat. Removal of parts off the glass, same procedure as you, hot water and soak, also I have cracked ordinary glass in the past, and?
opted for the toughened Pyrex (oven door glass) readily available locally.
?
Thanks
?
John
-- John |