On 2025-03-31 06:30, jjpurdum via groups.io wrote:
That's one thing Hans does right: He doesn't release stuff until he's
convinced it's bullet-proof.
*** Yup. That being said, the QMX+ is back on the shelf, and I'm back
to playing with the T41. Despite being a kit, the QMX is essentially an
appliance - from my point of view. Because it's closed source. For me,
its entertainment value is limited.
Hans has promised some sort of built-in language interpreter, and I
might go back to it when that's a reality.
- Jerry, KF6VB
Jack, W8TEE
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 09:30:34 PM EDT, jerry-KF6VB
<jerry@...> wrote:
On 2025-03-30 15:50, Greg KF5N via groups.io wrote:
Did you get a chance to look at the spectrum?
That seems like a lot of power for BS170s!
*** It's a digital PA. In the schematic, the BS170's are fed
RF by LOGIC gates. I think it's what's called a "class E".
They don't even have heat sinks. They output 5W without
breaking a sweat.
The spectrum looks good on my FTDX10. I haven't hooked it up to
a spectrum analyzer yet.
- Jerry, KF6VB
--
73 Greg KF5N
Links:
------
[1] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/message/33305
[2] /mt/111990371/243852
[3] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/post
[4] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/editsub/243852
[5]
/g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/leave/10484476/243852/1943518115/xyzzy
--
Jack, W8TEE
Links:
------
[1] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/message/33311
[2] /mt/111990371/243852
[3] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/post
[4] /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/editsub/243852
[5]
/g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio/leave/10484476/243852/1943518115/xyzzy
