开云体育

Hi Tony, Thanks for your reply. An email from a disgruntled individual doesn’t always elicit the desired response, as you’ve found. I’m talking about possible efforts from a number of

However you obtain the information about the contents of the box, there is no paradox.? You might get it by measuring the vibration of the box due to the cat breathing (or not). Whatever you do to

People at ADI already know because I told them a couple of years ago, along with what I thought of the status. Shortly after that, my emails stopped getting answered. But just before that happened, it

That's only because visible light waves don't pass through the box wall. X-ray vision would reveal the status of the contents. -- Regards, Tony

"?" can also be a 2 byte character, and that was one of the things that alerted me. As it happens, LTspice ignored the entire first line, when I wrote out what I thought was was Chris's 1st line in a

It works! Final problem was, that I wrote ?s into the time values - 1us that should have been. PWL REPEAT FOREVER file=pulses_discrete.txt ENDREPEAT 0.0s 0mV +500n 0mV +1us 0mV +500n 0mV

? is character 181_10 (B5 in hex) in extended ASCII. Does the parser accept any extended ASCII characters? ====================================================================================== Best

That points up the (philosophical) flaw in the Principle. It has even been suggested that a single electron can 'observe' and collapse the wave function.? You can look at it another way. While the

Chris, It's the the micro (?) characters. Wow, that was subtle! Do a global replace to "u" and that will fix it. The pwl syntax parser obviously cannot deal with unicode characters. -- Regards, Tony

Necessarily by a human or could it be by another cat? Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 7:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LTspice] Warning: Multiple definitions of model ... ... that the cat

I read that the crystal model drifted off-spec; "how far off-spec" was my first question -- then underlying that question is, why did the parameters drift so far? Are we talking about bit-rot?

There are ways using social media to gain the attention of and action from recalcitrant companies. Anybody interested? Comments?

Maybe there *is* a route to a true rand() function! Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 6:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [LTspice] Warning: Multiple definitions of model ... Dan wrote,

Dan wrote, "The problem I had was, that when I opened the model again, it was off its specifications, and so was not stable for use." Are you saying that the model parameters didn't exist until you

Christoph wrote that there was an error message "V4: requires a minimum of 5 parameters. Only 0 specified.", and asked, "Does anyone see the error?" No, we can't see the error, because you did not

Ok, my post above is a bit confused - it's showing what the times would evaluate to - to carry the point that the t_slew errors should not accumulate, the 32th bit will be at a time defined as

This reminds me of a time when I designed a crystal filter model, based upon a file I found on the net. I tweeked it's bandwidth.? The problem I had was, that when I opened the model again, it was

I use these same models but I delete the Russian devices, so I do not have to search over them.

Thanks to all. I was trying to follow the given recipes. But what I didn’t like with the suggestion(s) thath the rise hold and fall times would all pile up and would end with a significant offset at

John said, "... about the Uncertainty Principle,... I am not sure..."? LOL. Tim