¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
I wrote: That should be "terms", not "turns". Andy
By Andy I · #160585 ·
Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
LTspice does not have a built-in magnetics modeler.? You need to turn to another program (such as the previously recommended FEMM) for that.? Once you get the circuit parameters, then you can use
Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
I also hve the circuit in Ltspice , Is it possible to model a ferrite magnetic core in Ltspice ? Is there something similar pspice model editor for Ltspice ?
By Vendy · #160583 ·
Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
On 23/05/2025 16:35, edhooruper via groups.io wrote: > So I am modelling the magnetic core in Pspice model editor > > I got the B-H curve values from the TDK mcironas ferrite design magnetic tool and
By Tony Casey · #160582 ·
Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
This is not a group about PSpice.? There are other resources where you can ask questions directly about PSpice-unique problems.? This group is for LTspice. Is it possible you used the wrong units,
By Andy I · #160581 ·
Re: Modelling magnetic core of EP10 with T38 material of TDK micronoas
So I am modelling the magnetic core in Pspice model editor I got the B-H curve values from the TDK mcironas ferrite design magnetic tool and uploaded that into pspice model editor I also referred to
By Vendy · #160580 ·
Re: 24.1,x update woes
Hawker, If you only check in here once daily (after receiving your daily Digest), this is going to be an awfully tedious problem to solve. Please check back more often! Andy
By Andy I · #160579 ·
Re: 24.1,x update woes
No. You can, if you want to.? If you do go back, go back to version 24.0.12 or earlier.? Of the 24.1.x versions, the latest (24.1.8) should have the fewest problems and is preferred.? Do not try
By Andy I · #160578 ·
Re: 24.1,x update woes
Indeed I have 24.1.8. Is this a known problem install? Should/can I go back to a previous one? Is there a a way to go back before 24.1.8 if indeed this version has issues? I have been unable to get
By Hawker · #160577 ·
Re: 24.1,x update woes
I have not tried that, but I greatly doubt that you cannot do that.? It has never been a restriction before (in LTspice or anywhere, as far as I know).? IMHO it would serve no useful purpose to have
By Andy I · #160576 ·
Re: 24.1,x update woes
There are reverse-compatibility issues with 24.1.8, but exactly which 24.1.x are you using? Issues before x.x.8 are suspect. Are you getting errors or just warnings?
By John Woodgate · #160575 ·
24.1,x update woes
Howdy I finally got around to updating from 24.0.x to 24.1.x and a lot seems to have broken for me. Am I correct in assuming in 24.1 you cannot have a .include to a model you are not using? I tend to
By Hawker · #160574 ·
Re: Directory for custom symbols
The most important aspect of ensuring that all models, symbols, and subcircuits are checked in to the version control system is that it also ensures that everyone can always know that the specific
By Donald H Locker · #160573 ·
Re: Deactivate on Circuit or part of the circuit in LTspice
Out of nothing but my curiosity - why does it need to be a floating point parameter?? Would integers (0 and 1) have worked? If their meanings were ON and OFF, then values of 1 and 0 would seem to be
By Andy I · #160572 ·
Re: Deactivate on Circuit or part of the circuit in LTspice
In a reply to a rather old set of messages thread, <oerni@...> wrote: Where was that request for help? Was it the question on the 6th of May about Vlad's special Filters?? Vlad himself is the
By Andy I · #160571 ·
Re: Deactivate on Circuit or part of the circuit in LTspice
If you're desperate for an application more like LTspice where is possible, check out Qucs. This has been a feature for a long time. Most of us will find various other ways to work around this. The
By Tony Casey · #160570 ·
Re: Deactivate on Circuit or part of the circuit in LTspice
*It would be sufficient if subcircuit hierarchical blocks could be avoided from loading and inclusion into netlist per switch which can be controlled by a floating point parameter....(but keeping them
By oerni@... · #160569 ·
Re: Directory for custom symbols
Thanks eewiz that clears things up! Thanks Tony, we have really good redundancy and resiliency so it's unlikely the share drives would go down but I get your point and that's a good idea about using
By Jeff Kayzerman · #160568 ·
Re: Directory for custom symbols
Since you're an "Software Dev", you'll understand the complications involved when users are creating, sharing, usi
By Tony Casey · #160567 ·
Re: Directory for custom symbols
Hello Jeff, The following hierarchy mirrors LTspice's native file hierarchy. The mirror hierarchy makes browsing LTspice's native files and my user files look similar. It simplifies finding LTspice's
By eewiz · #160566 ·