Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYou put your device and its
model into a curve-tracer .ASC and set it up to produce (if it
will) the same curves as in the data sheet. Compare the
results. You can find curve-tracer .ASCs by going to Files on
the web site and Searching for 'curve tracer'. For a bipolar,
I would start with collector current as a function of
collector voltage with base current as parameter. But remember
the large variation of current gain between samples, even for
graded devices like BC847x. ======================================================================================
Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only Rayleigh, Essex UK I hear, and I forget. I see, and I remember. I do, and I understand. Xunzi (340 - 245 BC) On 2023-07-10 13:59,
aburtonline@... wrote:
I have searched for this and can't find anything that is generic and at my level but, is there somewhere information on a sensible validation procedure for the simple classes of model?? I mean something like at best a tutorial video going through the process, or a description of the process and what needs to be validated, or maybe at least a simple step by step guide.? I do hear what you experts say on the models being flawed and it would be good to verify the ones we each use regularly.? It's an area I have al;ways meant to dip into but I've never been able to address the first step. |
John Woodgate