开云体育

David, We had a new person join our group today but the setting was inccorrect. When a new member joins your group that person's initial *Email Delivery* setting would come from the *Default Sub

Based on your subject line I assume you have him on individual emails? Has anything been posted to the group in that interval? If not, it stands to reason that he wouldn't have received anything. If

Ok, everything was checked as it shold be Smile Thanks again Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 12:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GMF] unauthorized people joining my groups Thanks.

Adding to David's post here: In case it matters, the email domain of the new subscriber is verizon.net Thanks. Junu

We had a new person join our group today but the setting was inccorrect. It used the option of No EMail. That was corrected about an hour later but the person is not receiving any EMail three hours

Thanks. I will do that. Smile Sugar Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 12:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GMF] unauthorized people joining my groups

Sugar -- To keep people from joining without authorization, you must use the Restricted Membership method of Spam Control. Look for that block in your group settings and tick the first box. As for not

Peter, I hope your "complaint" gets a cogent response from btinternet. The use of the "+" is called "plus addressing" and is an important and useful feature of IMAP (Internet message access

Hi This morning, I found a individual who has joined my groups with out any notice How is that? When there is no monitors in my groups? sugar "A su

Shal, Bruce, Duane, Thanks to all three of you. In this particular case then, the topic lock worked as intended: it allowed the topic to cool off. And now I understand how it was able to be brought

Ellen, What should my profile state along with moderator etc. There is no *requirement* that you state anything in your group Profile, nor even that you make it available to group members. You might

Dave, And not being familiar with hashtags, did I just goof up by putting the No. It would only do that if a GMF moderator had checkmarked that option for #lock. We haven't, and if we did we would

Good afternoon, I have a question since I am the moderator and owner of the distribution list. What should my profile state along with moderator etc. Is there anything addtional I need to select.

Shal: I don't think we CAN say which of btinternet and synchronoss is responsible, since we do not know whether the buggy host reports the "for .." address before or after it corrupts this address.

David -- The answer to your question is actually quite involved, but the bottom line is that "subject lines" and "topics" are not the same thing. In groups.io, a "subject line" is a string of

No, not unless the hashtag is set to Locked as part of the setup (which it's not here.) Duane -- Help: /static/help GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Search

Dave, Look in the Topics view of your group's Messages page to see the new message is actually in the locked topic, or started a new topic. One of the weaknesses of locking (or moderating) topics is

And not being familiar with hashtags, did I just goof up by putting the 'lock' hashtag on my original question, thereby locking THIS topic? Dave

How did this happen? Just had someone post a reply to a message in a topic I locked a month ago. Both the OP and the reply-er are unmoderated and the post just appeared this morning. Even if for some

Peter, (either btinternet.com or synchronoss.net - we don't know which), > I think we do know that it is synchronoss.net. That's what the evidence says to me, GMF #18774