开云体育

Sugar -- To keep people from joining without authorization, you must use the Restricted Membership method of Spam Control. Look for that block in your group settings and tick the first box. As for not

Peter, I hope your "complaint" gets a cogent response from btinternet. The use of the "+" is called "plus addressing" and is an important and useful feature of IMAP (Internet message access

Hi This morning, I found a individual who has joined my groups with out any notice How is that? When there is no monitors in my groups? sugar "A su

Shal, Bruce, Duane, Thanks to all three of you. In this particular case then, the topic lock worked as intended: it allowed the topic to cool off. And now I understand how it was able to be brought

Ellen, What should my profile state along with moderator etc. There is no *requirement* that you state anything in your group Profile, nor even that you make it available to group members. You might

Dave, And not being familiar with hashtags, did I just goof up by putting the No. It would only do that if a GMF moderator had checkmarked that option for #lock. We haven't, and if we did we would

Good afternoon, I have a question since I am the moderator and owner of the distribution list. What should my profile state along with moderator etc. Is there anything addtional I need to select.

Shal: I don't think we CAN say which of btinternet and synchronoss is responsible, since we do not know whether the buggy host reports the "for .." address before or after it corrupts this address.

David -- The answer to your question is actually quite involved, but the bottom line is that "subject lines" and "topics" are not the same thing. In groups.io, a "subject line" is a string of

No, not unless the hashtag is set to Locked as part of the setup (which it's not here.) Duane -- Help: /static/help GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Search

Dave, Look in the Topics view of your group's Messages page to see the new message is actually in the locked topic, or started a new topic. One of the weaknesses of locking (or moderating) topics is

And not being familiar with hashtags, did I just goof up by putting the 'lock' hashtag on my original question, thereby locking THIS topic? Dave

How did this happen? Just had someone post a reply to a message in a topic I locked a month ago. Both the OP and the reply-er are unmoderated and the post just appeared this morning. Even if for some

Peter, (either btinternet.com or synchronoss.net - we don't know which), > I think we do know that it is synchronoss.net. That's what the evidence says to me, GMF #18774

Hello GMF We manage membership with a company membership agreement. However, we often allow people to be added to a mailing list with their personal email. The default membership admin screen shows

Jeremy: Gmail certainly does ignore dots in the left-side of an email address, but ONLY on left-sides of email addresses arriving into the gmail domain. firstsecond@gmail,com is treated the same as

<Big snip> Thanks so much for that explanation, Shal. Very kind of you to take the time to write it. Bob ——— “ A man sees in the world what he carries in his heart.” — Goethe, Faust

There is at least a potential issue with changing to a dot in I seem to remember that gmail ignores dots in the left side of email addresses (so group.owner and groupowner are regarded as the same) -

Congratulations, groups.io! And thanks to the moderators for your unceasing help and guidance and to Mark for the fantastic job he is doing! Victoria

"Groups.io Anniversary" When: Monday, 23 September 2019 Description: Introducing Groups.io ( https://wingedpig.com/2014/09/23/introducing-groups-io/ ) posted in Mark Fletcher's Blog on this date is