On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:01 PM, Ken Cameron wrote:
That's the biggest gap, is the group intended to
continue beyond the owner or not. While I think for many groups the intent
is to continue, I'm sure there are some that do not intend it to continue.
And to muddy the waters a bit (perhaps!) what about the situation where members have
paid to be members under the planned new charging or donation schemes? It seems entirely wrong that an owner can accept money from individuals while knowing that if anything happens to them (the owner) then the group "dies" and the member's payment is then worthless.
Chris
