Oh I know that you don't congratulate yourself. But I say you do a great job reporting the bugs.
?
But I?mentioned a sort of bug?to GMF yesterday and was told to write about to the Beta group which I at first said I would but didn't do and will not. It had to do with the deletion of a graphic.
?
Now I am not talking about attachments. This was an email where the graphics were embedded in the body of the email. It shows up in the upper portion of the email when moderating it in the pending messages. They also show up in squares down below. Now when a graphic is deleted from below by checking off the delete tic for that graphic but doing nothing above, when that message is approved, in the email version of the share, we see a X where the graphic used to be. However in the message archives there isn't any X and it is completely gone.
?
So in order to get rid of the X in the body of the email version, I was told that both the upper and lower sections needed to be removed. I did that the next time and it worked. But I was also?told that it may be a bug and I should write about it on Beta.
I know that a lot of suggestions come to that group. I see them. I do not take it personally, but at this time if others in this GMF group feel it is worthy of consideration, they can make the suggestion. It does seem that some members have?more clout then others. ?
Leeni -- I will occasionally take a post here in GMF forward and issue?bug report?on someone else's behalf. I will not do that with suggestions.?To the extent that you might see my posts being acted upon, that simply reflects the fact that bugs are bugs, and need prompt attention. I can assure you that I'm not sitting here congratulating myself on my level of influence on Mark.