Sometimes people will have responded to the initial post with errors (or maybe insults?) either making their post meaningless or confusing if the original post they are responding to is no longer visible.?

If they quote the original version in the process it may look as though they are misrepresenting the person they are responding to unless the original post is still available as evidence.?

A similar situation can arise with yahoo groups if someone deletes an abusive post someone else has already responded to.

Not sure what the answer is but there will be some occasions when a complete history of revisions may be useful, ?if people are able to edit their posts after sending.

Louise

?

>The final post shown would give the intended message.

Then again, why would it matter in most cases? Just because someone missed an error in a message, why would someone else care what was initially written? That information would be wrong according to the sender anyway, which is why they'd correct it.

?

Dano