开云体育

In a message dated 4/29/2005 9:15:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
aug20@... writes:

do not neglect to mention bouncing gently on a rebounder/mini-
trampoline. That is supposed to be one of the best ways there is to
cleanse and circulate the lymphatic system.



Elliot...all your positive rebounding comments have not fallen on deaf ears!
Mine arrived yesterday and I am already addicted! Easy, fun and I can do
something mindless like watch the news while I'm doing it. It's definitely a
keeper.
BarbF

Hi,
I posted yesterday about my uncle's liver cancer and I got a very
nice reply. Thank you. I have now read through the files provided.
I have one question. With flaxseed oil you need cottage cheese in
order to create an emulsion so the flaxseed cells get into the
bloodstream intact. I am not a scientist so forgive this simplistic
explanation. However I see in the diet plans that you can use ground
flaxseeds in juice. Do the ground flaxseeds not need to be mixed in
a suitable protein to be absorbed into the bloodstream? Or is it
different with ground flaxseeds in that your body can absorb these
without them being in an emulsion?
Which is better flaxseed oil/cottage cheese or ground
flaxseeds/juice? Could you use ground seed mashed into potato
instead of putting them into juice?

thank you

Andy

Hi Anna,

Can you remember where you read that and perhaps give more info? If you go
to a qualified lymphologist for your massages, there is no way that the
massaging and stroking will 'spread the cancer cells' - it is a way to
activate your lymph system to get rid of the garbage in your system.

I would advise all the cancer patients and those suffering from diabetes,
heart disease, whatever to visit this website and listen to the audio
recording -

Sometimes we have to be real careful about what we read.

Cheryl

Hi Cheryl,

About massages you said: > Maybe you should do some lymph work - to get

the

lymph moving.

Isn't a lymphatic drainage a type of massage.
I have read in the past that massages can spread cancer cells.

Anna

"Omega-3s Block Estrogen

Studies have shown that the hormone estrogen fuels the growth of breast
tumors. And omega-3 fatty acids block the effects of estrogen, Hardman says. Other
protective factors may also be at play. "

this article would seem to back up the flaxoil approach to breast cancer. . .


:

Breast Cancer Protection Starts in the Womb

Mom-to-Be's Diet Protects Daughters From Breast Cancer

By?Charlene ?Laino
WebMD Medical News Reviewed By?Michael ?Smith,?MD
on Wednesday, April 20, 2005
April 20, 2005 (Anaheim, Calif.) -- Women who eat fish and nuts during
pregnancy may protect their daughters against breast cancer years down the road.
Eating these foods during childhood also helps.

Mothers who choose foods packed with omega-3 fatty acids during pregnancy and
while nursing and then feed their kids such a diet after weaning may reduce
the risk of breast cancer in their daughters by nearly 90%, early research in
mice indicates.

"Just two servings of fish per week"Just two servings of fish per week and a
daily fish oil supplement would be a good start for most pregnant women," says
researcher W. Elaine Hardman, PhD, an assistant professor in the division of
functional foods at Louisiana State University's Pennington Biomedical
Research Center in Baton Rogue.

Western Diet Increases Breast Cancer

On the flip side, moms-to-be who eat a typical Western diet may be placing
their children at risk of breast cancer, she says. That's because our diet is
loaded with foods rich in omega-6 fatty acids -- meat, eggs, baked goods,
breads, and most vegetable oils, she says.

But women whose moms have told them they ate all the junk food in sight
during their pregnancy shouldn't panic. Feeding female baby mice a diet rich in
omega-3 fatty acids after weaning reduced their risk of breast cancer by 40% --
even when moms ate a typical Western-style diet.

"This tells us that even if a mom doesn't consume the best diet for cancer
prevention, her daughter can make up for it by consuming a diet rich in omega-3
fatty acids herself," Hardman tells WebMD. "It's never too late to switch."

Go for the Omega-3 Fatty Acid

The research adds to growing evidence that what a mother eats during
pregnancy and while nursing affects the health of her children years down the road,
says William Nelson, MD, PhD, professor of oncology at Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine in Baltimore.

The study was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for
Cancer Research.

Both omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are essential for good health. But in
Western diets, the amount of omega-6 fatty acids is much greater than omega-3
fatty acids -- exactly the opposite of what it should be for good health,
according to Hardman.

The ratio to shoot for, experts say, is roughly four times as much omega-3s
as omega-6s. But the typical American diet has it totally backward -- 20 times
as much omega-6s -- and that spells trouble.

Omega-3 fatty acids are found in fish, especially cold water fish such as
tuna, salmon, and mackerel, as well as in canola and flaxseed oils, soybeans, and
nuts. Foods rich in omega-6 fatty acids are meat, eggs, poultry, cereals,
breads, baked goods, most vegetable oils, and margarine.

Hardman studied mice that were genetically predisposed to develop breast
cancer.

During pregnancy, the mother mice were randomly assigned to a diet rich in
either omega-6 or omega-3 fatty acids. After the baby mice were weaned at 3
months of age, they were again randomly assigned to a diet rich in either omega-6
or omega-3 fatty acids.

All of the baby mice exposed only to omega-6 fatty acids -- in the uterus,
while nursing, and after weaning -- developed breast cancer by six months after
birth, "which was expected in this mouse model," Hardman says.

"But fewer than 60% of the female offspring with diets rich in omega-3 fatty
acids either maternally or after weaning developed [breast] tumors by 8
months," she says.

And only 13% of mice who were only given omega-3 fatty acids -- in the womb,
during weaning and after birth -- developed breast tumors.

Omega-3s Block Estrogen

Studies have shown that the hormone estrogen fuels the growth of breast
tumors. And omega-3 fatty acids block the effects of estrogen, Hardman says. Other
protective factors may also be at play.

It's going to take at least two generations to confirm the findings in
humans, Hartman says.

In the meantime, Nelson says, there's no harm in talking with your doctor
about the benefits of eating more fish, nuts, and other omega-3 fatty acid-rich
foods during pregnancy: They're also good for the brain, heart, immune system,
and just about all of our body systems, he says.

For pregnant women concerned about ingesting mercurypregnant women concerned
about ingesting mercury in tuna and certain other fish, Hardman recommends
fish oil supplements.

"But even two servings a week -- the current recommendation for pregnant
women -- is still probably three or four times more than the average American
gets," she says.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Even though I had a good xsonogram pic of the tumor, the surgeon required a
mammogram to get an appointment. after the smash and radiate I got there, the
tumore exploded with growth. just in time for the biopsy. . . medical equipment
is making ilness much worse. I know Budwig is similar to the Hippocrates
Health iInstitute, the resource in my neighborhood, in thinkingtht synthetics are
a big stumbling block in our homes. So the hospital, just full of fumes, is
the LAST place on earth a person struggling with cancer should be, IMO.

When I turned down my staging scans I lost a great oncologist. He just
wouldn't work "blind"

It is great that we have communities like this to back up teh things we know
instincually and support each other in our quest for real health.

In a message dated 4/30/05 6:32:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, aug20@...
writes:

no one appears to know for
sure how much radiation a CT Scan delivers.

how aobut PET scans? that's what all the followups are with my doc, since
thay are looking for active growth anywhere. the machine does a CAT AND a PET
simultaneously. And there is a radioactive injection too. Even the MRI has an
injection. And it comes in a motor home every Tuesday, is not stand alone
equipment.

wht do you think. is there a less radioactive type of PET?

I tried asking questions at the hospital already and got nothing but bland,
misinformed, reassurances that radioactivity at those levels is like a day at
the beach. I got NO specifics.

And I have gotten nowhere trying to find a thermography machine in a hospital
(I need insurance to pay).

So determining progress must be subjective? By how one feels?

I am also getting major strong armed to do radiation after I finish chemo
next month. I am refusing it. But their rationale is that my
diet/lifestyle/environemental changes, that even chemo, cant get at an area that has had four
surgical sites because teh blood vessels are damaged and the lymph channels razed.

So would that mean that the Budwig protocol would also miss the area where
the cancer cells mainly would have been spilled during surgery. Surgery is not
an exact science, the radiation is supposed to clean up the mess it leaves.

but, after four months, i am more concerned with messes that have left teh
area. in which case the budwig protocol makes sense.

right?

vanessa

Oh yes Elliot, you are so clever to pick this up - The mini trampoline is
THE no. 1 item to get the lymph flowing. Thanks for pointing that out.

Cheryl

I read 100 x-rays but I'll take the figure of 1,600 or 2,400..................after 100, that's enough. Really now, why would we do that except for an initial determination.

Once you know what you have the idea is to start getting well, not playing 'Doctor, can you please burn me some more and perhaps make my cancer worse'.

Maybe, my cancer is related to the tons of X-rays I've had?????? That's me talking and maybe it applies to a lot of us????

Professionals will tell you the equipment today provides for far less in radiation, but not when they take 10-15 pictures it doesn't. It's cumulative you know.

Joe C.

Is it alright if we do not use this? My brother said something about
indigestion/bowel movements.

Any one have info on how long Oleolox can be be kept.
Thanks

I have prostate cancer what other things did he do. Thanks

breathedeepnow <aug20@...> wrote:A close friend of mine who had prostate cancer used Breuss juice, along
with other things, and he is doing well now. No evidence of dis-ease.

The following web page has a very good overview of the CODEX problem for anyone wishing to get up to speed on the threat posed by CODEX:

"Always question
their diagnosis and their statements."

EXCELLENT advice, Anna! I agree 100 percent! Question! Question!
Question!

When I went to a surgeon to have him examine the tumor in my neck, he
began to say, "OK, we're going to do a CAT Scan of the tumor, and of
the front back and sides of your head..." I actually cut him off,
which I shouldn't have done---but I was already feeling so disgusted
with the oncologist who gave me 20 CT scans between 1989 and 1992,
that I was impatient with him. I interrupted the surgeon before he
could finish talking about a CT scan, and said, "No, we are not doing
ANY CT scans. We are doing an MRI."

He was taken aback, but he agreed to do an MRI rather than a CT scan.
He, too, did not know how much radiation a person gets from a CT
scan. It is scandalous, even criminal, that so very few mainstream
medical people know how much radiation CT scans deliver, though they
prescribe them out of hand and as a matter of course!

LOL, Ulla! Or, as some say in Canada, "bang on!"

The "Medical Establishment" has done much to persuade people to
mistrust and to ignore the messages their body gives them.

In "Cancer As A Turning Point," there is a scary/humorous true story
about a woman(thankfully a forthright and self-confident one)who was
hooked up to a heart monitor that malfunctioned and began to "flat
line." When it did, all kinds of personnel rushed into her room with
the defibrillator and other emergency equipment, ready to "bring her
back to life." "HEY!" she shouted at them, "EXCUSE ME, BUT I AM SITTING
UP IN BED DRINKING A CUP OF ORANGE JUICE! THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH
ME! IT'S YOUR MACHINE THAT'S MALFUNCTIONING!"

She truly had to scream at them in order to keep them from trying to
resuscitate her, despite the fact that there was obviously nothing
wrong with her, which goes to show how completely ridiculous things
have become with regard to how much the mainstream medical community
mistrusts and disrespects "the wisdom of the body" AND "the wisdom of
the client."

"I know this may sound too way out for some peolpe, but I just listen
to my body for knowing if things are going right or not.
Elliot will tell you that scans are to be used, if at all, very
carefully."

You bet, Anna! In an earlier message, I said that an oncologist who
feels the need to administer CT scan after CT scan to determine how a
client is doing is a klutz and a stumblebum.

"I have heard that one CT-Scan is equal to 100 Chest X-Rays. Would I
take 100 Chest X-Rays? Why would I inflict that on already diseased
organs? However that is me."

Joe, good advice, but I wonder about your numbers. The
research I have done tells me that one abdominal CT scan contains the
equivalent of 800 chest x-rays, and from that I calculate that a full-
body CT scan could contain as much radiation as 2400 or more x-rays.
People who receive CT scans are NEVER told by their doctor or by the
facility administering the CT scans, how much radiation they are
getting. It's an insane situation.

A close friend of mine who had prostate cancer used Breuss juice, along
with other things, and he is doing well now. No evidence of dis-ease.

Hi, Esther.

If you MUST get CT and/or PET scans to see how you are doing, then at
least get them as RARELY as possible. From all the research I have
done, it appears that just ONE full-body CT scan delivers perhaps as
much radiation as 1600 chest x-rays. I am basing that on the fact
that I read that an abdominal CT scan delivers as much radiation as
800 chest x-rays!

I happen to think a doctor who has to use regular CT scans on a
person---say, 1 every 2 months, or even more than that, is a klutz---
someone who has no idea how to judge how a client is doing other than
irradiating them!

There is an oncologist in California who is able to judge how his
clients are doing by their mood, their eyes, their skin, and so on.
Essentially, if a client is "bright-eyed and bushy-tailed," he feels
no need to do a CT or a PET scan.

I hope you will share your concerns with your oncologist, Esther, and
that you will ask him if he knows how much radiation there is in the
specific scan or scans he wants to do on you. If he does not know,
then tell him to find out!

Best wishes,

Elliot

do not neglect to mention bouncing gently on a rebounder/mini-
trampoline. That is supposed to be one of the best ways there is to
cleanse and circulate the lymphatic system.

Elliot

Hi Cheryl,

About massages you said: > Maybe you should do some lymph work - to get the
lymph moving.

Isn't a lymphatic drainage a type of massage.
I have read in the past that massages can spread cancer cells.

Anna