Good idea Brent. I belong to several groups that thin out the lurker¡¯s every so often.
? \
? ? \ ?/\?
? ? ( ? ) ? ? ? ? ? ?Alice
?.( ? ? ?). ?lwr32@...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 17, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Brent via Groups.Io <whodo678@...> wrote:
?
Quality over quantity, any day.?
I'm sure there were many lurkers, many who did not feel they could contribute. It might also be good to thin the ranks of inactive email accounts. A lot of the lurkers are those that only come to the groups, what are not heavy users, and only look when they have a problem, instead of skimming the post and learning ahead of time. Just like face to face groups, sports, hobby or social. There are the doers and those that are just along for the ride.
Brent
On Oct 17, 2019, at 2:34 PM, Rkkeller wrote:
The other group had almost 14,000 members and maybe 25 ever posted.? We are already at 100 members
and each one had to come and join themselves so while not a large number, if the 25 main people join, we
will be back to normal with 100-200 or so real members.
Rich
Alice