Re: DB157 Morning Massacre SSR question
|
No, but Tom is pretty much involved with the development of all the Dispatches scenarios. So to amend my initial email. Ted/Tom.
Thanks,
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: Mitch Abrams <mhabrams@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, Jan 16, 2021 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: [yasl] DB157 Morning Massacre SSR question
Carl,
My copy of Morning Massacre, DB 157 has Ted Wilcox as the Scenario Designer, not Tom Morin.
I am guessing mine is not a misprint but you could have some insider information that I do not have.
Best,
Follow up. Better question is, was that designer intent? As you correctly point out Derek, that is the impact of the rule. Tom Morin?
Carl?
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
Date: 1/16/21 11:26 AM (GMT-05:00)?
Subject: [yasl] DB157 Morning Massacre SSR question?
Good morning,My posting is around how SSR#1 impacts Interdiction.??Situation:-? SSR#1 says that "Due to dawn low visibility conditions, FFMO (A4.6) is NA for the scenario."??-? From A10.53 Interdiction:??A routing unit which enters an Open Ground hex without Low Crawl, in both the LOS and Normal Range of an unbroken enemy unit capable of fire on it in that hex with at least one FP without any form of LOS Hindrance, is subject to a NMC and everything that normally entails.?
-? From A10.54 Open Ground:??For purposes of rout determination, Dash, concealment gain/loss, and Interdiction, an Open Ground hex is any hex in which?the particular enemy unit(s) could apply, during a hypothetical Defensive First Fire opportunity (regardless of what attacks it actually made in previous phases), the -1 FFMO DRM.
Conclusion:? Due to SSR #1, units can now route across streets, etc. without the risk of Interdiction (assumes they follow all the other routing direction rules).??
Question:? Is the conclusion correct?
How are others interpreting this and playing it?
Thanks,
Derek
|
