Man is a storytelling animal and Rudolph Steiner understood this like no one else. I refer to a lengthy conversation I had with ChatGPT on Steiner and bureaucracy (see below). For those who don’t want to read it all: we live in a very structured society. It became noticeable in the 19th century, with the start of modern bureaucracy. This freaked some people out and they tried to escape it mentally. Luckily there was Steiner to tell them stories for adults. Stories he claimed all to be true. Unfortunately -or was it intentionally- they had unequal treatment of people at their core.
User: Are you familiar with the book The Utopia of Rules by David Graeber?
?
Assistant: Yes, I am familiar with The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy by David Graeber. In this book, Graeber explores the nature of bureaucracy in modern society. He argues that while bureaucratic systems are often associated with rationality and efficiency, they are often inefficient and obstructive. The book discusses how bureaucracy is not just a necessary evil but a system that paradoxically attracts people due to the stability and predictability it offers.
?
Graeber combines anthropological insights with political and economic analysis to support his arguments, and he examines how bureaucratic systems impact our culture and everyday life. Do you have specific questions about the book or particular themes that Graeber addresses?
?
User: Yes, I want to test a hypothesis.
?
Assistant: That sounds interesting! What is the hypothesis you want to test? And how can I assist you with that? I can help with summaries, explanations of specific ideas from the book, or discussing how certain concepts might apply to your hypothesis.
?
User: In the book, Graeber describes human stories that take the form of implicit critiques of bureaucracy, such as fantasy stories based on a fictional idea of medieval society. Is that correct?
?
Assistant: Yes, that is correct. David Graeber discusses in The Utopia of Rules how many popular stories, especially in the fantasy genre, implicitly critique bureaucratic structures. Graeber argues that these stories often provide a nostalgic view of a pre-modern society, which is portrayed as simpler and more straightforward compared to the complex and often alienating bureaucratic systems of modern times.
?
He suggests that the appeal of such stories partly lies in their opposition to the confusion and alienation people experience in their daily interactions with bureaucracies. These stories offer a contrast to the “iron cage” of bureaucracy, as Max Weber called it, showing a world where heroes can act without having to navigate a thicket of rules and procedures.
?
Graeber also points out the irony that many of these stories, while rejecting bureaucracy, often contain complex systems of rules and hierarchies themselves, creating an interesting tension between the desire for a world without rules and the reality that rules are sometimes necessary to make a world understandable and manageable.
?
User: Okay, here comes the hypothesis. I think that Rudolf Steiner’s anthroposophical teachings are also a form of these types of stories, only they are not situated in a fictional context, but in reality. Steiner’s ideas about the spiritual world can be seen as a form of anti-bureaucratic narrative.
?
Assistant: That’s an interesting hypothesis. Rudolf Steiner, the founder of anthroposophy, developed a worldview that posits a deeper spiritual reality behind the physical world. In his view, there are spiritual hierarchies and forces that influence human development and the universe. Steiner often criticized the materialistic and mechanistic views dominant in his time, and his work can be seen as a reaction against the technocratic and bureaucratic tendencies of modern society.
?
Your hypothesis that Steiner’s teachings could be considered an anti-bureaucratic narrative seems plausible. Like the fantasy stories Graeber refers to, anthroposophy offers an alternative worldview that emphasizes spiritual and non-material values. This can be seen as a response to the soulless, rational approach of bureaucratic systems, which are often experienced as restrictive and alienating.
?
In Steiner’s vision, there is a strong emphasis on individual spiritual development and a personal connection with higher spiritual truths, contrasting with the impersonality and uniformity characteristic of bureaucratic structures. This can appeal to people frustrated by the limitations of bureaucratic systems and looking for a meaningful and fulfilling alternative.
?
The idea of a spiritual world with its own rules and structures can also be seen as a parallel, but more flexible and meaningful “bureaucracy,” in the sense that it provides people with a framework to understand their lives and experiences, but without the rigidity and impersonality of administrative bureaucracies.
?
So, you could argue that Steiner’s anthroposophical teachings indeed offer a narrative that, like fantasy stories, takes a critical stance towards the bureaucratic organization of modern society, but situated in a non-fictional, spiritual context.
?
User: And just like Graeber says, Steiner’s teachings contain a complex set of rules and hierarchies, don’t they?
?
Assistant: Yes, that’s correct. Just like in many fantasy stories that Graeber describes, Rudolf Steiner’s anthroposophical teachings also contain a complex system of rules, hierarchies, and concepts. In anthroposophy, the cosmos is seen as a structured and organized world, where different spiritual beings and forces operate at various hierarchical levels. Steiner introduced detailed teachings on the spiritual evolution of humanity, the planet, and the universe, emphasizing the existence of higher levels of consciousness and spiritual realms.
?
This structure resembles what Graeber describes in fantasy stories, where alternative rule systems and hierarchies are often present. While both systems resist the rigidity of modern bureaucracies, they still create their own forms of order and structure. This seems to reflect a paradox: the desire to escape bureaucratic constraints often leads to the creation of new systems that, though different in nature, are still complex and organized.
?
So, while Steiner’s teachings reject the limitations and materialistic views of modern society, they nonetheless provide a detailed and structured worldview that helps people understand their place in the universe and their spiritual development. This makes it both an escape from and an alternative to the bureaucratic systems Graeber discusses.
?
User: Let’s continue. Could it be possible that this hypothesis also explains Steiner’s racism? Graeber discusses inequality in this context, doesn’t he?
?
Assistant: David Graeber does touch on issues of inequality in *The Utopia of Rules*, particularly in relation to how bureaucratic systems can perpetuate social hierarchies and inequalities. However, he does not directly address Steiner's ideas or the specific issue of racism within his work.
?
Rudolf Steiner's teachings have been critiqued for including racial elements, which some interpret as racist. Steiner proposed that humanity evolves through stages associated with different "races" or cultural epochs, a concept that has been controversial and criticized for its potential to reinforce racial hierarchies and prejudices. These ideas can be seen as an unfortunate aspect of his broader cosmological and spiritual framework, which posits different stages of spiritual development for individuals and groups.
?
Considering your hypothesis, one could argue that Steiner's worldview, despite its spiritual orientation and critique of modern materialism, nonetheless includes hierarchical structures that can mirror or even reinforce societal inequalities, including those based on race. This would align with Graeber's observation that even anti-bureaucratic narratives can contain complex systems of rules and hierarchies, which can inadvertently perpetuate inequalities.
?
Thus, if Steiner's teachings are viewed as a reaction to the bureaucratic and technocratic tendencies of modern society, they also reflect a broader pattern where alternative worldviews, while critiquing certain aspects of the modern world, can still embody problematic aspects such as racial hierarchies. This suggests that the anti-bureaucratic or counter-cultural narratives aren't immune to perpetuating inequalities, even if unintentionally.
?
User: I see what you mean. I was thinking about the part of the book where Graeber speaks about all kinds of creatures that inhabit the fictional stories. These creatures (elves, trolls, goblins, etc.) have man-like features, but are generally not treated as men. This in contrast with bureaucracy, which at least ideally tries to treat people by the same standards. Couldn’t Steiners racial hierarchy be seen as an antibureaucratic narrative where even the racism is logical and not only unintentional?
?
Assistant:
?
That's an intriguing perspective. In *The Utopia of Rules*, David Graeber indeed discusses how fantasy stories often include various humanoid creatures that, despite having human-like characteristics, are treated differently from humans. This differential treatment can reflect and critique real-world social hierarchies and inequalities, including racial and cultural distinctions. Graeber notes that while bureaucracy in theory aims to treat all individuals equally through standardized rules and procedures, fantasy worlds often highlight the arbitrary and unequal treatment of different beings.
?
Applying this to Rudolf Steiner's racial theories, one could argue that his hierarchical view of different "races" and cultural epochs might reflect a similar narrative framework. In this framework, different groups of people are seen as inherently distinct, much like the different creatures in fantasy stories. This can be interpreted as an attempt to rationalize and make sense of perceived differences between groups, often in a way that justifies inequality or even discrimination.
?
Thus, Steiner's racial theories could be seen as part of an anti-bureaucratic narrative that resists the homogenizing tendencies of modern bureaucratic systems, which seek to apply the same standards to everyone regardless of their background. In this context, the racial hierarchy isn't just an unfortunate or unintentional element but might be viewed as a logical outcome of a worldview that emphasizes spiritual and cultural differences. This perspective could suggest that in rejecting the impersonal equality of bureaucratic systems, Steiner's ideas, whether intentionally or not, reintroduce and even rationalize a form of hierarchy and inequality, including racism.
?
It's important to note, however, that this interpretation is complex and controversial. Steiner's defenders might argue that his views were intended to emphasize cultural diversity and spiritual development rather than promote inequality. Nonetheless, from a critical perspective, it's possible to see how these ideas could serve to justify unequal treatment of different groups, similar to how fantasy narratives sometimes portray and rationalize the differences between various fictional races and creatures.
Dan Dugan