----- Original Message -----

From: KD5NWA

To: softrock40@...

Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 10:13 AM

Subject: Re: [softrock40] Clock Generator Chip Order

Last call before I put in the chip order, I'll send in the order at 14:00 CST.

Those that have ordered, please send me your mailing address so I can
figure out the postage and have the mailers ready to go as soon as
the chips arrive.

I'm up to 51 chips? mostly ICS501M's so far for a estimated total
order cost of $135


At 11:09 PM 11/6/2005, you wrote:
>Tomorrow (Monday CST) I will be ordering the ICS501, and ICS601 clock
>generators/multiplier chips, they look to be quite useful in
>generating high frequency clocks from low frequency crystals, and can
>go as high as 160 MHz.
>
>The ICS501 is used in the Time Machine by Expanded Spectrum Systems
>for both receive and transmit Quadrature clock generator.
>
>< >
>
>The parts that I'm thinking about ordering and their major
>characteristics are listed below, the difference in the 501 parts is
>the temperature range.
>
>ICS501M, [email protected], 160MHz@5V, 0 to 70 degree C, 8 pin SOIC $1.25 +
>split shipping
>ICS501MI, [email protected], 160MHz@5V, -40 to +85 degree C, 8 pin SOIC,
>$1.75 + split shipping
>ICS601M-01I, [email protected], 156Mhz@5V, -40 to +85 degree C, 16 pin
>SOIC, $4.63 + split shipping
>
>The ICS501 part can go as high as 8X the crystal.
>The ICS601 part can go as high as 16X the crystal, also available in
>TSSOP packaging.
>
>The link below has the specifications on the chips, if you want to
>add some to my order, let me know early so I can place the order by
>the end of my workday.
>
>< >
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Cecil Bayona
>KD5NWA
>www.qrpradio.com
>
>I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
>same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
>only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ...
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Cecil Bayona
KD5NWA
www.qrpradio.com

I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ...?