On a slightly different note, have you noticed how AI / machine
learning seems to be producing some pretty interesting results at
ancestry.com?? I'm not crazy about yet another pay site, but I've
been amazed by its ability to (seemingly ... I haven't fully
proofed very many) accurately match rather distant autosomal
hits.? The sort of people that you scroll by in the autosomal
results at FTDNA and think "that one just isn't worth pursuing".
EH
On 6/30/22 19:11, Edward Hammond wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Completely agree that there's not much new to discuss.? My
intent was to simply have a point of contact should anything
interesting arise.? Since you were frequently the emcee, I
thought you might have the best list and judgment as to who to
place here.? If you simply pass along the list of names and
e-mail addresses you think are appropriate, I can send an
invitation to join to those people.? If you think its not worth
that effort, fair enough, it's certainly true that we haven't
had any news of note for some time.
I've turned into a very low power - milliwatts - high frequency
radio nut in the absence of anything genetic to do!? That and
journeyman forester, trying (often in vain) to contain the
unbelievably aggressive invasive species trying to consume the
little shred of forest I own.
Edward
On 6/30/22 18:29, Nigel B via
groups.io wrote:
?
Hi Edward - all good here. ?Apologies for not sorting our
S16264 distribution list. ?I have been busy with other
interests / activities. ?It is now several years since I had
any new Y-DNA matches and I confess I have lost much of my
motivation for keeping the group going. ?Still I agree we
should not let links lapse as we might all learn more from
future matches. ?Will try harder! ?
Nigel
?Hi Nigel -
Hope your summer is going well.? We're still all by our
lonesome in this group.
Edward
