¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
OK, I'm of the opinion that almost everything Autodesk has done is either drastically limited or paid. I've got the standard version of Eagle, 7.7.? That was purchased on a hobby license, so I cannot
By Harvey White · #8508 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Hi Peter, However, the thought of not having any of my design files available locally on my PC does not sit well with me - I was very much of the same opinion. Realistically though how justified is
By joeaverage · #8507 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Craig - I fully understand your point of view as a functioning business that must be efficient and up to date with the latest CAD/CAM. I retired from gainful work at the end of the last century - so
By peterg1000 · #8506 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Hi, as I say AutoRouter is not a feature I use. Fusion does support it, and I've spent the last half hour fiddling with it, and it seems to work fine. Whether it is that same, better or worse than the
By joeaverage · #8505 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Hi, Does fusion electronics bring back the auto router? Good question, I don't use the Auto-Router. I'll experiment and report back soon. Craig ________________________________ Sent: Monday, 13
By joeaverage · #8504 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Does fusion electronics bring back the auto router?
By bownes · #8503 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Hi, Autodesk - in their wisdom - seem set to kill off the current versions of Eagle, including the free version used by many hobbyists - myself included. The version running under Fusion is apparently
By joeaverage · #8502 ·
Re: Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
peterg, I agree that it would be wonderful if AutoDesk would release 9.6.2 in a 2 layer version without the phone-home feature, but it seems very unlikely.? They doubtless think they will lose
By John Ferguson · #8501 ·
Eagle 9.6.2 #eagle #etch #gcode #2-layer
Autodesk -? in their wisdom - seem set to kill off the current versions of Eagle, including the free version used by many hobbyists - myself included. The version running under Fusion is apparently
By peterg1000 · #8500 ·
Re: Alternatives to PCB-GCODE #etch
Thank you! I'm glad it has been, and continues to be, useful to you. Regards, JJ
By John Johnson · #8499 ·
Alternatives to PCB-GCODE #etch
Out of curiosity I has a look at FlatCAM as an alternative to PCB-GCODE.? What a devilishly complicated process to go through that PCB-GCODE accomplishes almost instantaneously with one or two mouse
By peterg1000 · #8498 ·
Re: #pcbgcode GCODE generation bug #pcbgcode
JJ, thanks for your reply. This came about from a problem I encountered with a PCB that had a coin cell battery holder and a few other parts on it. I wanted to clear the spare around the holder so I
By Steve Eggo · #8497 ·
Re: #pcbgcode GCODE generation bug #pcbgcode
That¡¯s an unusual application. What is your goal? If you need to clear a large area, you could try a crosshatch, or draw lines on the milling layer, but using a cad program (or script) to generate
By John Johnson · #8496 ·
Re: #pcbgcode GCODE generation bug #pcbgcode
Dissapointed I have not had any replies, so here is information on how to recreated the problem. Board 75 x 50mm, 25th track 25mm in from each edge. GCode setup shown, using a 1mm cutter Preview of
By Steve Eggo · #8495 ·
#pcbgcode GCODE generation bug #pcbgcode
Hello, I think I have found a bug in PCB-GCODE V3.6.6 What is the best way to report this. Running from Eagle 9.6.2, using pcb-gcode Setup, Isolation with Maximum set to 30, the gcode output starts
By Steve Eggo · #8494 ·
Re: #pcb-gcode-wizard #version101/April 2012 #pcb-gcode-wizard
I did not lose support. I still have it and it does the same perfect job it has been doing for years. It still works fine even in Windows10. lt also runs in *nix using wine environment. You only need
By Vasile Buruiana · #8493 ·
Re: #pcb-gcode-wizard #version101/April 2012 #pcb-gcode-wizard
Okay, I¡¯m confused. It looks like I own pcbgcode.com now. Not sure if the previous owner transferred it to me, or how that happened. Either way, that¡¯s a good thing ? Also, Happy New Year to
By John Johnson · #8492 ·
Re: #pcb-gcode-wizard #version101/April 2012 #pcb-gcode-wizard
Sorry to hear you all have lost support of this program. pcbgcode.com isn¡¯t my website. In a moment of being overly generous, I agreed to allowing whomever registered pcbgcode.com to do so. I
By John Johnson · #8491 ·
Re: #pcb-gcode-wizard #version101/April 2012 #pcb-gcode-wizard
I also purchased a license for this program and found it useful for cleaning up some ¡°extra¡± routing paths etc. However, I am unable to get it to run on Windows 10 so it has been useless since
By John Blanchard · #8490 ·
#pcb-gcode-wizard #version101/April 2012 #pcb-gcode-wizard
Hello, A long time ago I found and downloaded a free version of the pcb gcode wizard executable program. I remember I sent a big complicated ngc g-code file to test the stability, then I purchased the
By Vasile Buruiana · #8489 ·