开云体育

Hi Rune
V0.0.10 works fine, thank you.
May I suggest that the selection dots for the markers had a toggle
function such that when these was not marked the were locked and when
marked the marker was moveable. Alternative a further line called lock
markers. My eager right hand fingers hit very often the left mouse key and
the active marker is suddenly somewhere else.
Also if the vertical unit were scaleable would be nice e.g. to have
selectable dB ranges in steps or freely selectable. Same applies for polar
plot to e.g. to be able to study a load close in if inductive or capacitive
or both.
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af Rune
Broberg
Sendt: 18. september 2019 22:36
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA Saver

I just released 0.0.10:


It's not the most exciting release, but it offers some quality of life
improvements, such as the ability to choose the font size (particularly
useful for Linux users, whose default is a massive 11 pt font).

It also adds debug logging: -d to get log messages to the terminal, or -D
filename.txt to log to a file. Useful if you see crashes!

Additionally, it now supports importing magnitude/angle touchstone files,
and there's been a number of little bugfixes.

As ever, I look forward to hearing what bugs you find, and what new
features you want! :-)

--
Rune / 5Q5R

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 18:05, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:

Rune,
The new "Using the software" section on your GitHub page (
) is much appreciated! The
new pip installation also is nice, although on Windows I prefer to
just download your release and run the executable from my "C:\NanoVNA"

directory.

Hi Rune,

Attached is the calibration File.

Thanks Again.

Jim K. K8SLC

Rune,
Thanks for all of your work on this. I know from personal experience the
effort and dedication that something like this requires. When I bought my
NanoVNA, I had no idea that I was "surfing" the early adopters wave. I am a
recently retired electrical engineer and the intellectual stimulation has
been welcome, especially when dealing with a well designed software
application like yours. The "bleeding edge" apps are not always this well
thought out. It is quickly getting to the point where the first digit of
the version number can be an integer greater than zero.

I do have a suggestion....

I have a 4k UHD monitor and one of the issues that I have is that most
apps use fonts that have a single pixel stroke width which can be quite
hard to read. I know that you have a font size option, which helps,
however, I found that simply going to the Bold version of a font can widen
the font stroke width and make big improvements in readability on a UHD
monitor without changing the font size. Perhaps, you could put this option
on your to do list for a future version.

73
Logan, KE7AZ

Rune,
I just checked out your Latest commit, 0.0.10a and loving the fact that on
my 1366x768 display I can see the whole screen without needing scrollbars.
All the charts size very nicely at font size 7, even with show data
turned. I think the pop up windows for Files, Calibration, Display setup,
and About are nicely thought out. I wish at some point in the future you
could add a setting under "Display setup" that would allow the user to add
a centered caption at the top of the graphs for documentation purposes.
Keep up the great work!

Hi , I found some info about the smoothing and average on Keysight network
analyzer at this link :




Best regards
Maurizio

hwalker,

Where do you find NanoVNA Saver 0.0.10a.exe ? I went here:
and see 0.0.10 but not
0.0.10a. Would love to have the whole screen fit in my 1366X768 screen.

Rune,

Thank you so much for fitting the whole screen into a 1366x768 screen.
That will really make the NanoVNA Saver software so much easier to use.

Thanks,
Steve_WB8GRS

Hi Rune
V0.0.10 works fine, thank you.
May I suggest that the selection dots for the markers had a toggle
function such that when these was not marked the were locked and when
marked the marker was moveable. Alternative a further line called lock
markers. My eager right hand fingers hit very often the left mouse key
and the active marker is suddenly somewhere else.
Also if the vertical unit were scaleable would be nice e.g. to have
selectable dB ranges in steps or freely selectable. Same applies for
polar plot to e.g. to be able to study a load close in if inductive or
capacitive or both.
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af
Rune Broberg
Sendt: 18. september 2019 22:36
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA Saver

I just released 0.0.10:


It's not the most exciting release, but it offers some quality of life
improvements, such as the ability to choose the font size
(particularly useful for Linux users, whose default is a massive 11 pt font).

It also adds debug logging: -d to get log messages to the terminal, or
-D filename.txt to log to a file. Useful if you see crashes!

Additionally, it now supports importing magnitude/angle touchstone
files, and there's been a number of little bugfixes.

As ever, I look forward to hearing what bugs you find, and what new
features you want! :-)

--
Rune / 5Q5R

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 18:05, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:

Rune,
The new "Using the software" section on your GitHub page (
) is much appreciated! The
new pip installation also is nice, although on Windows I prefer to
just download your release and run the executable from my "C:\NanoVNA"

directory.

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 06:09 AM, Mario Vano wrote:

CORRECTION: (I mistyped)

- The multi-band dipole is my 20ft high 40/20 meter trap dipole that has
been augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a
toroid common mode filter.

I've been happily using the NanoVNA and various versions of "Saver" for

a lot

of projects lately, but some were just motivated by curiosity about the
device.

Unfortunately I have no other analyzer to compare to. In any case here

are

some sweeps from earlier tests that might be useful for reference or
amusement. In most cases, they were done with my very early attempts at

full

bandwidth calibration.

- The fm filter is a commercial product from the rtl-sdr.com people.

- The LW filter is a homebrewed design I use to augment VLF beacon

hunting.

- The multiband dipole is my 20ft high 80/40 meter trap dipole that has

been

augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a toroid
common mode filer.

- The 6 meter antenna is an attic mounted dipole with a toroid common

mode

filter.

I've also used happily used the device and "saver" to design and build a

6

meter "squalo", but forgot to save the files from the latest testing

run. I'm

currently working on a 400-700 mhz indor LPA design and plan to try to

use the

device for relative pattern and gain testing.

Earlier tests with several types of 500-900mhz 1/4 wave mag-mount

antennas and

TV rabbit ears showed useful relative gain results at 2-3 wavelength

spacings.

73, AE0GL

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 06:09 AM, Mario Vano wrote:

CORRECTION: (I mistyped)

- The multi-band dipole is my 20ft high 40/20 meter trap dipole that has
been augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a
toroid common mode filter.

I've been happily using the NanoVNA and various versions of "Saver" for

a lot

of projects lately, but some were just motivated by curiosity about the
device.

Unfortunately I have no other analyzer to compare to. In any case here

are

some sweeps from earlier tests that might be useful for reference or
amusement. In most cases, they were done with my very early attempts at

full

bandwidth calibration.

- The fm filter is a commercial product from the rtl-sdr.com people.

- The LW filter is a homebrewed design I use to augment VLF beacon

hunting.

- The multiband dipole is my 20ft high 80/40 meter trap dipole that has

been

augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a toroid
common mode filer.

- The 6 meter antenna is an attic mounted dipole with a toroid common

mode

filter.

I've also used happily used the device and "saver" to design and build a

6

meter "squalo", but forgot to save the files from the latest testing

run. I'm

currently working on a 400-700 mhz indor LPA design and plan to try to

use the

device for relative pattern and gain testing.

Earlier tests with several types of 500-900mhz 1/4 wave mag-mount

antennas and

TV rabbit ears showed useful relative gain results at 2-3 wavelength

spacings.

73, AE0GL

Hello Rune,

Again thank you for your perseverance with the nanoVNA PC Software you are
bringing us all! It is very much appreciated.

However I have a question regarding Calibration using your software, I
presume that before I set about doing a Calibration in nanoVNA-Saver, and
reset it, I should also do a reset of the VNA Hardware itself? Or is this
taken care of by nanoVNA-Saver? As I still see the "0" come up alongside
the "C" in the left hand sidebar.

73's
Pete
ZL2iK



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Rune Broberg
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2019 07:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA Saver

For those waiting for new binaries: I just published 0.0.11 :-)

This release brings averaging as a new feature: Press "Sweep settings" to
select between running a single sweep (of optionally multiple segments), a
continuous (live) sweeping of the range, or to average several sweeps from
the NanoVNA. You can configure how many averages to make, and optionally,
how many of the sample points to discard, based on which deviate the most
from the rest, and are least likely to contribute signal.

Also added is a new Resistance/Reactance chart, which shows both the R and
X component of R+jX. This brings the challenge of showing two traces for
the same data - added is therefore the option of picking a secondary colour
for sweeps under "Display settings".

There are further improvements to UI sizing, meaning the interface now fits
- tightly - on a 1366x768 screen, at least on Windows.

A few quality of live improvements made it in: Press escape in any of the
pop out windows to close them instantly. The calibration window now shows
more clearly when the source of calibration data is loading from a file,
and also the number of points loaded. A few crash bugs were fixed.

I look forward to hearing feedback from all of you!



--
Rune / 5Q5R

On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 17:14, Mario Vano <mvano@...> wrote:

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 06:09 AM, Mario Vano wrote:

CORRECTION: (I mistyped)

- The multi-band dipole is my 20ft high 40/20 meter trap dipole that has
been augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a
toroid common mode filter.

I've been happily using the NanoVNA and various versions of "Saver" for

a lot

of projects lately, but some were just motivated by curiosity about the
device.

Unfortunately I have no other analyzer to compare to. In any case here

are

some sweeps from earlier tests that might be useful for reference or
amusement. In most cases, they were done with my very early attempts at

full

bandwidth calibration.

- The fm filter is a commercial product from the rtl-sdr.com people.

- The LW filter is a homebrewed design I use to augment VLF beacon

hunting.

- The multiband dipole is my 20ft high 80/40 meter trap dipole that has

been

augmented with parallel dipoles for 15 and 10. The feedline has a

toroid

common mode filer.

- The 6 meter antenna is an attic mounted dipole with a toroid common

mode

filter.

I've also used happily used the device and "saver" to design and build

a

6

meter "squalo", but forgot to save the files from the latest testing

run. I'm

currently working on a 400-700 mhz indor LPA design and plan to try to

use the

device for relative pattern and gain testing.

Earlier tests with several types of 500-900mhz 1/4 wave mag-mount

antennas and

TV rabbit ears showed useful relative gain results at 2-3 wavelength

spacings.

73, AE0GL