开云体育

Hi Tom I tried to install and did set the properties as shown in the png file but got error two error prompts with information that liblapack.dll and 587.dll was missing. So not straight forward to

Hi Bill, There's a wealth of information in the files section. 72 / 73... Larry AC8YE

Hi, I have some idea of a few things I can do with new NanoVNA when it arrives. I will be paying attention to the posts here to help learn about the things it can do that are new to me. 73, Bill KU8H

Hi Larry, Hoping you can assist, I am trying to make a bulk purchase of 22 H4's for radio club members in Australia, I have filled in the contact email to Maggie requesting a quote on shipping etc and

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 01:40 PM, WB2UAQ wrote: Just did some return loss testing with the hp 8721 and not working as expected. After calibrating with a short the RL for an VSWR of 1.5 should be 14 dB.

Sorry Dennis, Only members of my local Radio Club, My biggest problem is how on earth do I get my verification code by email to use Alibaba.com to ask them for a quote??Just keeps going round in

Hi Tomasz. I will take a look at HAM_VNA. I have just been using spreadsheets. I am in the Bangor and District radio club i see you live near. Keep safe 73 de MI5AFL Ian __

You can measure all paths, one by one, measure the loss in the paths. Just remember to terminate all unused ports into 50 ohm resistors/terminators

I find this topic non-trivial.. I usually measure components with S11 only and for displaying impedance and creating equivalent circuit use a copy of HAMVNA originally by Alex VE3NEA, I modified and

Download NanoVNASaver development version from https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/tree/Development Little fix Hardware.py to support H4 and 201 datapoint All work good

Here is a pdf link to the return loss bridge based on the Stockton design: https://www.yagicad.com/Bridge1.pdf I’ve been following this thread and I kept hearing about the Stockton design. Didn’t

Just did some return loss testing with the hp 8721 and not working as expected. After calibrating with a short the RL for an VSWR of 1.5 should be 14 dB. Measure about 13 dB. If I calibrate with an

I just found pull request #129 by ae6ty, which does 95% of what I was thinking of! Adding small linear/more dense regions for the amateur bands might be useful as well....

Open s2p file in VNWA software

You read the Console Command user guide...... ;-) You need to get into the console mode (talk to the Nano via Putty or TerraTerm) and use the 'power' command. From the Console Command guide: power -

What do you do to set the power output ? Tnx es 73, Dick, W1KSZ ________________________________ Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 9:16 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject:

Paul, please refer to the forum wiki - it has all the answers you're looking for. There is also a files section in the forum with several user guides and other great info. Cheers!

I see comments on various models, such as "F", "H" "H4" etc. What are the differences in these models? Thanks, Paul W8SBH

Hi Pete You are right it depends on the type of DUT whether attenuations is acceptable and even a SMA inline attenaultor is not 50 ohm either. I have found the shunt T is ideal when measuring coils /

Add bigger font support not difficult (need just redefine font init, and made some space limit and changes in plot.c and ui.c), sorry but i not plan do it (and support it), source code open and