Re: F303 and 4" LCD for next generation NanoVNA
#circuit
#flash_size
#improvement
#enclosure
#battery
Hi Hugen, I recently purchased my from ALI Express. I am totally new to the VNA. How can one identify if it is a clone or not. Regards Oscar
By
Oscar A <oscar_abr@...>
·
#8263
·
|
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode
#improvement
You can contact Maggie to modify, Maggie will choose the appropriate courier, most European countries do not need to add additional postage. hugen
By
Hugen
·
#8262
·
|
Re: My nanoVNA doesn't go into DFU mode
#improvement
Greetings, I am unable to complete the checkout process with two different credit cards. Do you take Paypal? Dave W6TE
By
Dave W6TE <w6te@...>
·
#8261
·
|
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode
#improvement
Dear Hugen, that's good news. I would recommend the store to my friends. We appreciate your work. I see that shipping is 15$ for my country (Romania), also for some EU countries, but for other EU
By
Ady, YO2NAA
·
#8260
·
|
Re: F303 and 4" LCD for next generation NanoVNA
#circuit
#flash_size
#improvement
#enclosure
#battery
I have made these changes, but I always get an error interrupt. It may be caused by some register values not being reset properly. hugen
By
Hugen
·
#8259
·
|
Re: F303 and 4" LCD for next generation NanoVNA
#circuit
#flash_size
#improvement
#enclosure
#battery
The firmware for NanoVNA-H needs to be recompiled before it can be used. You need to modify the MCU and LCD drivers and some UI changes. You can view the code of AA6KL. AA6KL has completed most of the
By
Hugen
·
#8258
·
|
Re: Are any of the NanoVNA sold on Amazon any better or worse than any others? Is there a better U.S. site to order from?
There are more than 5 clones of NanoVNA-H at present, some are with shielding cases. But due to their wrong assembling, the performance decreases. Assembling the shielding case is to isolate
By
Hugen
·
#8257
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
ann : we just finished the experimental comparison - the results verified our predictions for two constructed two-ports - #83 : On the Doubtfulness - 13 December 2019 -
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8255
·
|
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
One last, many of the HP loads are air, the most often home made open and short are PTFE loaded, there is a VF difference. The HP load is definately air (minimal dielectric) to the resistance. The
By
aparent1/kb1gmx <kb1gmx@...>
·
#8254
·
|
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode
#improvement
Menu -> Config -> DFU nothing else need vy73 de Teo Am 16.12.2019 um 00:01 schrieb Herman De Dauw:
By
Besitzer
·
#8253
·
|
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode
#improvement
Have you read the Wiki files for upgrading ? Zadig is not nessecary. And you need to place the boot switch of jumpers needed to start in DFU mode.
By
ON1BES
·
#8252
·
|
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Jef One more comment. The load being 50 ohm it is not sensitive to a small displacement of the calibration plane. You will soon see a perfect T-Check Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#8251
·
|
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Jeff It is not a mystery why it work ? You open offset delay is not 14.491ps but 17.15ps with the C0 and C1 included Then the difference between the short and open is 17.15-16.695=0.45ps so the
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#8250
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to underline what we already said in: #83 : On the Doubtfulness - 13 December 2019: /g/nanovna-users/message/8173 that is : it is just a "new" -but
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8249
·
|
My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode
#improvement
I received a nanoVNA last week and tried to upgrade it. I ran Zadig and updated the drive according to Zadig's default suggestion. Once done, I sort circuited the boot0 and Vcc terminals, connected
By
Luciano Gasparini PT9KK
·
#8248
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Thank you again GIN&PEZ; This is both an interesting and exciting journey of discovery and understanding for me. Your diligence and persistence, along with the availability and convenience of modern
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#8247
·
|
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Fair enough. I'm a bit sceptical of the T-check method. R&S don't sell the device to do this any any more, but they used to. They only sell verification kits based on airlines and attenuators. Ken
By
Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd
·
#8246
·
|
Re: Increasing measurement range (ohms) ?
I guess a revisit to using an impedance matching network to solve this issue is required. Once a upon a time we spent significant effort building RX bridges, noise bridges, etc... and spent much time
By
alan victor
·
#8245
·
|
Re: Are any of the NanoVNA sold on Amazon any better or worse than any others? Is there a better U.S. site to order from?
========================================================== The newest hardware release is the NanoVNA-h, see attachments. It is priced slightly higher than the old release but is a better overall
By
hwalker
·
#8244
·
|
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Mechanical construction of standard have a relationship to the plane of calibration. Basically you can measure that as distance or time they use time as its easy to measure. What does it mean is that
By
aparent1/kb1gmx <kb1gmx@...>
·
#8243
·
|