¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode #improvement
Menu -> Config -> DFU nothing else need vy73 de Teo Am 16.12.2019 um 00:01 schrieb Herman De Dauw:
By Besitzer · #8253 ·
Re: My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode #improvement
Have you read the Wiki files for upgrading ? Zadig is not nessecary. And you need to place the boot switch of jumpers needed to start in DFU mode.
By ON1BES · #8252 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Jef One more comment. The load being 50 ohm it is not sensitive to a small displacement of the calibration plane. You will soon see a perfect T-Check Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig
By Kurt Poulsen · #8251 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Hi Jeff It is not a mystery why it work ? You open offset delay is not 14.491ps but 17.15ps with the C0 and C1 included Then the difference between the short and open is 17.15-16.695=0.45ps so the
By Kurt Poulsen · #8250 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to underline what we already said in: #83 : On the Doubtfulness - 13 December 2019: /g/nanovna-users/message/8173 that is : it is just a "new" -but
By gin&pez@arg · #8249 ·
My nanoVNA does't go into DFU mode #improvement
I received a nanoVNA last week and tried to upgrade it. I ran Zadig and updated the drive according to Zadig's default suggestion. Once done, I sort circuited the boot0 and Vcc terminals, connected
By Luciano Gasparini PT9KK · #8248 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Thank you again GIN&PEZ; This is both an interesting and exciting journey of discovery and understanding for me. Your diligence and persistence, along with the availability and convenience of modern
By Gary O'Neil · #8247 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Fair enough. I'm a bit sceptical of the T-check method. R&S don't sell the device to do this any any more, but they used to. They only sell verification kits based on airlines and attenuators. Ken
By Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd · #8246 ·
Re: Increasing measurement range (ohms) ?
I guess a revisit to using an impedance matching network to solve this issue is required. Once a upon a time we spent significant effort building RX bridges, noise bridges, etc... and spent much time
By alan victor · #8245 ·
Re: Are any of the NanoVNA sold on Amazon any better or worse than any others? Is there a better U.S. site to order from?
========================================================== The newest hardware release is the NanoVNA-h, see attachments. It is priced slightly higher than the old release but is a better overall
By hwalker · #8244 ·
Re: Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
Mechanical construction of standard have a relationship to the plane of calibration. Basically you can measure that as distance or time they use time as its easy to measure. What does it mean is that
By aparent1/kb1gmx <kb1gmx@...> · #8243 ·
Are any of the NanoVNA sold on Amazon any better or worse than any others? Is there a better U.S. site to order from?
Are any of them newer hardware release levels? Any to avoid?
By JimR · #8242 ·
Re: Cases
Here's what I use. Drill 2 holes and cut a 2" slot and presto, a case with a lid for $1.60 plus 4 more cases for other projects.
By W5DXP <w5dxp@...> · #8241 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
2 - @Gary O'Neil, N3GO 15 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8238 Hello again, We are terribly sorry but we forgot to emphasize enough that a model such this one is totally
By gin&pez@arg · #8240 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
@Gary O'Neil, N3GO 15 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8238 Dear Gary, Not at all. Would you read, please, our related message: #85: On the Formation of a Virtual Port 15
By gin&pez@arg · #8239 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
GIN& PEZ; Do your assertions in: #84: On the Virtuality of the "Measurement Port" signal that you are abandoning your pursuit of a two port model of a ¡°LeastVNA¡±, or is it simply a statement that
By Gary O'Neil · #8238 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
#85: On the Formation of a Virtual Port Hello, Allow us, please, to somehow explain the formation of a Virtual Port facupov, in our sow. Well, since we can always introduce the "reflection" relation:
By gin&pez@arg · #8237 ·
Homebrew Female SMA standards and T-Check
A few years ago I made an open and a short female SMA standard for calibrating my HP 8753C VNA (for the load I used a very nice 85052 female 3.5mm load). I never used the open and short above about 30
By Jeff Anderson · #8236 ·
Re: Increasing measurement range (ohms) ?
As measured impedance get significantly higher or lower then 50 ohms the variance in bridge resistors create greater errors.
By roncraig1@... · #8235 ·
Re: Cases
I bought a case from the eBay source Terry referenced. I did have fo file one edge to get the proper fit, but otherwise, no problems. -ed, k9ew
By Ed - K9EW <k9ew57@...> · #8234 ·