sensitivity (instability)
Bonjour ,Hi i have been searching in old topics what i am experiencing and i did not find anything. So did you ever notice that the reading of S11 is pertubated if you touch or not the nanovna. even
By
ve2zvz@...
·
#7255
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hi Rune I do not know if you noticed my information on how to measure high Z component where the port extension is an important addition. Likewise a new screen display/window showing Rp and Xp would
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#7254
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hi Rune I will modify my calibration document and maintain the 50fF (it might be forgotten to delete/change) and adjyst the dealy accordingly. I think this is the safe way. I will also add
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#7253
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Not sure. I often use port extensions when measuring a DUT with a different cable. Being able to quickly rotate the cable away during regular measurement is a very nice feature. Also it would help if
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#7252
·
|
Re: Batteries
Greetings to the Battery Group :) I have some batteries for Samsung Galaxy S3, 2100mAH, that are a just a bit smaller than the nano and would fit inside with slightly longer standoffs. But here the
By
KV5R <kv5r@...>
·
#7251
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hi Rune , in my opinion ,the right place of the port extension control , is on the calibration menu. Best regards Maurizio IZ1MDJ
By
Maurizio IZ1MDJ
·
#7250
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hello Kurt, a value of 1 should work. But I haven't had time to test it thoroughly :-) I will look into making a value of 0 work as well, or give an error if it is not possible. "Port extension" delay
By
Rune Broberg
·
#7249
·
|
Re: Batteries
TL;DR: if unsure, ONLY use cells >= 2400mAh and <= 10000mAh with the Nano. The reason for the upper limit is a bit more subtle; it's due to the fact that the charge cut-off current is fixed (100mA),
By
OwO
·
#7248
·
|
Re: Batteries
The IP5305 can not limit current to a "safe" value for the battery because it doesn't know what the battery's capacity is. It simply limits current to 1.2A or whatever the USB port can supply,
By
OwO
·
#7247
·
|
Re: running nanoVNA-saver under Linux Mint XFCE
Interesting.? I am not a trained I.T.person, have been using Linux since 2002, and have had pretty much no problems with it at all.? I do, however, find Windows to be a royal PITA, on those rare
By
Jim Allyn - N7JA
·
#7246
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:56 PM, W5DXP wrote: "The 'H' on a NanoVNA-H supposedly means it is a Hugen device. Is there anything keeping the cloners from labeling their devices as -H ?"
By
hwalker
·
#7245
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hi Run Aha, thank you for the info. That is a nasty one ? Then a value of 1 might me OK ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]>
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#7244
·
|
Re: Batteries
Hi All, I used the battery from a Boefeng 888 which was broken down to make an Allstar node. Labelled as 2.2Ah, and includes a protection board. 73 Barry G4MKT
By
Barry Jackson
·
#7243
·
|
Re: Running NanoVNA on MacBook Pro
A number of forum members run their NanoVNA on Mac computers.?Please do some searching around the message topics and you will find a number of threads on this and the issues you might see.? ...
By
Larry Rothman
·
#7242
·
|
Re: Batteries
Hallo Karsten, Ja, if I read you correct, I 100% agree. Vy 73 de Andy
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#7241
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
The 'H' on a NanoVNA-H supposedly means it is a Hugen device. Is there anything keeping the cloners from labeling their devices as -H ?
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#7240
·
|
Re: Batteries
To the question "Trickle charge current is also mentioned on the spec sheet as being 100ma, not enough to kill a 400ma cell." If you read the datasheet fully, you find this lines: #Low Battery voltage
By
Karsten, DD1KT
·
#7239
·
|
Running NanoVNA on MacBook Pro
hi all, forgive me if I missed any previous post on this subject. Is it possible to run a nanoVNA on a MacBook, any problems, how to, s/ware etc ? thanks Wayne VK6EH
By
Wayne Johnson
·
#7238
·
|
Re: Batteries
Agreed. But I was not saying that it should be the case, or was the case ;-) I believe that Li-Ion prefer a typical 0.5C most of the time, so at the worst case lets assume a NanoVNA charge controller
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#7237
·
|
Re: Batteries
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:56 PM, Andy wrote: Trickle charge current is also mentioned on the spec sheet as being 100ma, not enough to kill a 400ma cell. Am I missing something ?
By
hwalker
·
#7236
·
|