Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Erik My Outlook 2019 sucks ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af erik@... Sendt: 30. september 2019
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3536
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Dear gin&pez, Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my questions. I must apologize -- it is clear that my questions were too vague. I hope you will allow me to ask them in a clearer
By
Jeff Anderson
·
#3535
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Added to Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/Application-Notes
By
Oristo
·
#3534
·
|
Re: New document
http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a transmission line.pdf No, that failed I know some might argue filenames are less readable, but if you use underscores or hyphens rather than
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3533
·
|
Re: New document
Your email program seems to enforce a max line length cutting the url in two If you copy the url directly from the browser it may work (if not too long) Erik.
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#3532
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Kurt, Here's the link (I hope!): http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some%20basic%20knowledge%20about%20a%20transmission%20line.pdf By the way, if I go to your top page, http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/, I don't
By
Jeff Anderson
·
#3531
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some%20basic%20knowledge%20about%20a%20transmission%20line.pdf Interesting example on how to get rid of the remaining osculation due to fringe C/L of the calibration load
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#3530
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi, It is nice to know that you made it work. neb
By
neb
·
#3529
·
|
New document
Hi Again Erik This time by creating a new mail I succeded http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a transmission line.pdf
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3528
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Kurt, it might be worth creating a fake Touchstone file with an exponentially decaying amplitude, ¡°modulated¡± with a sine wave - I *think* that would produce the right result. If you exaggerated
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3527
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Erik Thank you for the link in html I tried to change my response to html but is failed Here is another handy document of general interest http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3526
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Oristo Thank you for your lingual suggestions I have printed your input for picking up any more suggestions. Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected]
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3525
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi Ned would i be able to try your software please tas758 at hotmail.com
By
tas758@...
·
#3524
·
Edited
|
Re: This is the most active group/list I subscribe to
Currently, and as one of the owners, that is my take on things. I myself have also felt as if I am drinking from a fire hose (5") at times. Splitting the group would require that members subscribe to
By
Dave Daniel
·
#3523
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Me, for one; * not much space next to PC keyboard http://ormpoa.altervista.org/RFspace.JPG * hands are usually full when going to work elsewhere, making pocket-size VERY handy. * with more secure
By
Oristo
·
#3522
·
Edited
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Thanks Rune, it's working well now. The only change I would make is to make the traces on the graphs a little wider. Thanks again, Cecil at w5dxp.com
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#3521
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi Neb. PLease send me a copy of the software to palolq(at)ymail.com 73! Palo.
By
Palo
·
#3520
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi neb, TDR is work well.
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#3519
·
|
Re: This is the most active group/list I subscribe to
Don't forget there are account settings where you decide whether to receive an email for every individual post, or a single digest each day, or no emails etc etc. I receive a daily digest, but I
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#3518
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
23 : On the Uncertainties of the "Standards" - Part I @ Jeff Anderson : /g/nanovna-users/message/3294 Hello, Thank you very much for your most encouraging message ! We much appreciate
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#3517
·
|