Currently, and as one of the owners, that is my take on things. I myself have also felt as if I am drinking from a fire hose (5") at times.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Splitting the group would require that members subscribe to multiple groups. I'm not sure that that would be helpful. Hashtags ans subgroups require that member's associate their posts with the appropriate hashtag or subgroup (to some extent - this sort of organization can be done automatically, but it's not much different than threading). I'd be willing to entertain anything that helps; I'd want to see what mechanism is being proposed and how it would affect the readability of the forum content (pros AND cons). So far, I think the best solution is for members to read what is immediately of value based on need and interest and ignore the rest. Remember, the content is always available online if one wants to go back and review a thread. DaveD On 9/29/2019 9:17 PM, mike watts via Groups.Io wrote:
It's great now.? Don't screw it up. --
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. |