|
|
On Monday 29 November 2021 11:43:59 am Francesco wrote: Is freware you daunload for the NanoVNA, but please read bifore the Manual is very important. Looked that stuff over, and it looks pretty interesting. Is that software windows-only? I don't run windoze here at all... -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" - Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
|
Re: Testing NanoVNA classical from 1Mhz to 2Ghz 101p
Testing MARCONI Filter 400Mhz to 1.2Ghz with NanoVNA classical Version: 0.8.0 sweep 1Mhz to 2Ghz 101p.
|
Testing NanoVNA classical from 1Mhz to 2Ghz 101p
Testing NanoVNA classical version 0.8.0 from 1Mhz to 2Ghz 101p.
Francesco.
|
Yes I'm still using it very aften !!
Jos
Op 30-11-2021 om 13:25 schreef Igor Jobim:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hello OneOfEleven. Not only do I use the nanovna-app, I also recommend it to everyone who wants a software. Nanovna-app is excellent software. Thanks for your work.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 08:15 AM, OneOfEleven wrote:
I'm surprised people are still using the app to be honest.
I think the VNA's need a good new single app written using the free to use QT
C++ development environment so that it can be easily compiled on all the main
three OS's. I wish I'd used QT to write the app I did, I know QT well as I've
used it over the years for many writings.
--
Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware.
|
Sigh... that's what I get for trying to remember everything about everything (at my age)
Yeah - ok, a mea culpa.
I was thinking the LibreVNA?
Too much technology too quickly!!
Hey - at least we have our (hitech) toys to play with.
'nuff said. I think I started a storm here.....
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 09:49:56 p.m. EST, Dragan Milivojevic <d.milivojevic@...> wrote: machined housing? LiteVNA has the same plastic case as Nano, judging by the images. Were you thinking of LibreVNA? On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 03:45, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote: It's a totally different beast. Completely different design,PCB,machined
housing., Etc.
The only thing in common are that it's a VNA and it's relatively
inexpensive.
Litevna is a trademarked name as is nanovna.
They're not related
? On Mon., 29 Nov. 2021 at 8:50 p.m., Roland Turner via groups.io<roland=
[email protected]> wrote:? Larry,
Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA
Both are inexpensive? VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other. What distinction are you making? The LiteVNA has only just appeared so
information is a little scarce, but it appears to be another nanovna
variant. Do you have reason to believe that it's not?
- Roland
|
Hello OneOfEleven. Not only do I use the nanovna-app, I also recommend it to everyone who wants a software. Nanovna-app is excellent software. Thanks for your work.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 08:15 AM, OneOfEleven wrote:
I'm surprised people are still using the app to be honest.
I think the VNA's need a good new single app written using the free to use QT
C++ development environment so that it can be easily compiled on all the main
three OS's. I wish I'd used QT to write the app I did, I know QT well as I've
used it over the years for many writings.
|
I'm surprised people are still using the app to be honest.
I think the VNA's need a good new single app written using the free to use QT C++ development environment so that it can be easily compiled on all the main three OS's. I wish I'd used QT to write the app I did, I know QT well as I've used it over the years for many writings.
|
|
|
I hope to see more people test and give some information about the Lite-VNA. *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 7:33 AM *From:* "DiSlord" <dislordlive@...> *To:* [email protected]*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Do I return my H4? Hima brand #buying #hardware #nanovna-h4 NanoVNA H/H4 and NanoVNA V2 have diferent hardware and software, LiteVNA more like V2 (in hardware) then H/H4 Yes UI look same, but this is only because I am engaged in the development of these interfaces and it is easier for me. Everything regarding the conduct and methods of measurements, calibration, protocols, everything is different. Different PCB, structure.
|
NanoVNA H/H4 and NanoVNA V2 have diferent hardware and software, LiteVNA more like V2 (in hardware) then H/H4
Yes UI look same, but this is only because I am engaged in the development of these interfaces and it is easier for me.
Everything regarding the conduct and methods of measurements, calibration, protocols, everything is different.
Different PCB, structure.
|
Larry, On 30/11/21 10:45, Larry Rothman wrote: It's a totally different beast. Really? How do you tell? Completely different design, The LiteVNA wouldn't stand out amongst a collection of the various NanoVNAs. PCB, Different NanoVNAs already have different PCBs. machined housing., Etc. Different NanoVNAs already have different housings, or even no housing. The only thing in common are that it's a VNA and it's relatively inexpensive. Really? You're asserting that the firmware, UI, means of operation, performance characteristics, interfaces, etc. are unrelated, except to the limited extent shared by all VNAs? Litevna is a trademarked name as is nanovna. No doubt, but NanoVNA has pretty obviously become generic by virtue of uncoordinated and uncontested use by multiple manufacturers and vendors. Indeed, I applaud a manufacturer taking the initiative to select and use a distinguishing name instead of trading on the generic term. They're not related As above, I'd suggest that the LiteVNA is well within the existing range of variability for NanoVNAs. What benefit do you see in sustaining the position that the LiteVNA somehow isn't a NanoVNA? - Roland 9V1RT
|
machined housing?
LiteVNA has the same plastic case as Nano, judging by the images.
Were you thinking of LibreVNA?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 03:45, Larry Rothman <nlroth@...> wrote: It's a totally different beast. Completely different design,PCB,machined
housing., Etc.
The only thing in common are that it's a VNA and it's relatively
inexpensive.
Litevna is a trademarked name as is nanovna.
They're not related
On Mon., 29 Nov. 2021 at 8:50 p.m., Roland Turner via groups.io<roland=
[email protected]> wrote: Larry,
Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA
Both are inexpensive VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other. What distinction are you making? The LiteVNA has only just appeared so
information is a little scarce, but it appears to be another nanovna
variant. Do you have reason to believe that it's not?
- Roland
|
It's a totally different beast. Completely different design,PCB,machined housing., Etc.? The only thing in common are that it's a VNA and it's relatively inexpensive.? Litevna is a trademarked name as is nanovna.? They're not related On Mon., 29 Nov. 2021 at 8:50 p.m., Roland Turner via groups.io<roland@...> wrote: Larry, Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA
Both are inexpensive? VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other. What distinction are you making? The LiteVNA has only just appeared so information is a little scarce, but it appears to be another nanovna variant. Do you have reason to believe that it's not? - Roland
|
Larry, Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA
Both are inexpensive? VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other. What distinction are you making? The LiteVNA has only just appeared so information is a little scarce, but it appears to be another nanovna variant. Do you have reason to believe that it's not? - Roland
|
Hello, I associate the NanoVNA with the LiteVNA for the form, circuit, interface, the difference is the frequency range, the other political or commercial difference I live to other, for me they hare people to make device for the electronics community and I appreciate all. If you have noted more technical difference please tell the forum to give all more information. Best regards. G7OYO Francesco. *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 5:44 PM *From:* "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...> *To:* " [email protected]" < [email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Do I return my H4? Hima brand #buying #hardware #nanovna-h4 Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA Both are inexpensive? VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other.
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 12:25:42 p.m. EST, Francesco <realfran@...> wrote: *One new version of NanoVNA is LITE-Nano. from 50Khz to 6.3 Ghz. Two version vith different size of screen* [email protected] you faund all information for it. You can buy from one of these sellers *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:11 PM *From:* "Alan Brown via groups.io" <va3aqb@...> *To:* [email protected]*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Do I return my H4? Hima brand #buying #hardware #nanovna-h4 look at the link left side 2nd from bottom tells you who to buy from
|
Please do not associate the name NanoVNA with LiteVNA
Both are inexpensive? VNAs but one has nothing to do with the other.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 12:25:42 p.m. EST, Francesco <realfran@...> wrote: *One new version of NanoVNA is LITE-Nano. from 50Khz to 6.3 Ghz. Two version vith different size of screen* [email protected] you faund all information for it. You can buy from one of these sellers *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:11 PM *From:* "Alan Brown via groups.io" <va3aqb@...> *To:* [email protected]*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Do I return my H4? Hima brand #buying #hardware #nanovna-h4 look at the link left side 2nd from bottom tells you who to buy from
|
*One new version of NanoVNA is LITE-Nano. from 50Khz to 6.3 Ghz. Two version vith different size of screen* [email protected] you faund all information for it. You can buy from one of these sellers *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:11 PM *From:* "Alan Brown via groups.io" <va3aqb@...> *To:* [email protected]*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Do I return my H4? Hima brand #buying #hardware #nanovna-h4 look at the link left side 2nd from bottom tells you who to buy from
|
There is other good software I use to. " NanoVNA-APP" Is good software too freeand can you use for different Nano brand. *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:43 PM *From:* "Francesco" <realfran@...> *To:* [email protected]*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Nanovna Is freware you daunload for the NanoVNA, but please read bifore the Manual is very important. *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:13 PM *From:* "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...> *To:* " [email protected]" < [email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Nanovna
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 11:01:42 a.m. EST, Fred Moore <n40cla@...> wrote: What application created these images? And how and where can I acquire this? Fred - N4CLA On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:48 AM Francesco <realfran@...> wrote: Hello, this is my S-A-A v2 clone and work, yours don't work? I think the
different groups support you not the device.
Device support is from the seller.
On this group or other there hare people ready to help other this is the
reason for the support group.
Ask your question about your device and someone came to help you.
There is a lot of good people on the NanoVNA different groups ready to
help not worry.
Best regards.
Francesco.
73/ G7OYO
*Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:46 PM
*From:* "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Nanovna
Hi Anthony,
This is the support group primarily for the original version of the
NanoVNA, H & H4 devices but members have a mix of the various devices and
experiences.
Also - please search the forum messages - there is a lot of info. I wrote
a how to search doc that is the 1st link in the Wiki. The trick is to start
wide and narrow down the search terms - and don't give up after 2 searches.
20 or so messages back there are 2 links to the SAA support groups.
...Larry
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 06:36:43 a.m. EST, Anthony <
n2ki.ham@...> wrote:
What have I gotten into? (bigger frown).? Anyway, to clear things up for my
own mind,? since I have purchased my unit from R&L, I would presume this
group would be the support group for my unit (SAA2N).? Is that correct?
Thanks!
Regards,
Anthony (N2KI)
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 10:54 PM Walt Weber <waltweber@...> wrote:
Anthony, a few observations:
The wiki in this group makes the following observations that I find
relevant:
Section 1.1.5 for hardware shows that the "nanorfe.com" website is
associated with the nanovna 2-0 , aka OwOComm's S-A-A-2
Section 1.1.6 covers the Nanovna-H4 , and lists it as different hardware
from the SAA2
Also, the nanovna.com website points back to this group for support,
while the nanorfe.com site points back to a different group here on
groups.io, the NanoVNAV2 group.
So I associated the question of "approved vendor" in this group with the
wiki in this group, and the nanovna.com
Different hardware, both using the name "Nanovna" --- hmmm, what could be
confusing about that?? (slight grin)
|
Is freware you daunload for the NanoVNA, but please read bifore the Manual is very important. *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 4:13 PM *From:* "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...> *To:* " [email protected]" < [email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Nanovna
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 11:01:42 a.m. EST, Fred Moore <n40cla@...> wrote: What application created these images? And how and where can I acquire this? Fred - N4CLA On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:48 AM Francesco <realfran@...> wrote: Hello, this is my S-A-A v2 clone and work, yours don't work? I think the
different groups support you not the device.
Device support is from the seller.
On this group or other there hare people ready to help other this is the
reason for the support group.
Ask your question about your device and someone came to help you.
There is a lot of good people on the NanoVNA different groups ready to
help not worry.
Best regards.
Francesco.
73/ G7OYO
*Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:46 PM
*From:* "Larry Rothman" <nlroth@...>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Nanovna
Hi Anthony,
This is the support group primarily for the original version of the
NanoVNA, H & H4 devices but members have a mix of the various devices and
experiences.
Also - please search the forum messages - there is a lot of info. I wrote
a how to search doc that is the 1st link in the Wiki. The trick is to start
wide and narrow down the search terms - and don't give up after 2 searches.
20 or so messages back there are 2 links to the SAA support groups.
...Larry
On Monday, November 29, 2021, 06:36:43 a.m. EST, Anthony <
n2ki.ham@...> wrote:
What have I gotten into? (bigger frown).? Anyway, to clear things up for my
own mind,? since I have purchased my unit from R&L, I would presume this
group would be the support group for my unit (SAA2N).? Is that correct?
Thanks!
Regards,
Anthony (N2KI)
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 10:54 PM Walt Weber <waltweber@...> wrote:
Anthony, a few observations:
The wiki in this group makes the following observations that I find
relevant:
Section 1.1.5 for hardware shows that the "nanorfe.com" website is
associated with the nanovna 2-0 , aka OwOComm's S-A-A-2
Section 1.1.6 covers the Nanovna-H4 , and lists it as different hardware
from the SAA2
Also, the nanovna.com website points back to this group for support,
while the nanorfe.com site points back to a different group here on
groups.io, the NanoVNAV2 group.
So I associated the question of "approved vendor" in this group with the
wiki in this group, and the nanovna.com
Different hardware, both using the name "Nanovna" --- hmmm, what could be
confusing about that?? (slight grin)
|
Francesco
Igor - PY3IG