Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:56 PM, W5DXP wrote: "The 'H' on a NanoVNA-H supposedly means it is a Hugen device. Is there anything keeping the cloners from labeling their devices as -H ?"
By
hwalker
·
#7245
·
|
Re: Some required setting for NanoVNA-saver using female calibrations
Hi Run Aha, thank you for the info. That is a nasty one ? Then a value of 1 might me OK ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]>
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#7244
·
|
Re: Batteries
Hi All, I used the battery from a Boefeng 888 which was broken down to make an Allstar node. Labelled as 2.2Ah, and includes a protection board. 73 Barry G4MKT
By
Barry Jackson
·
#7243
·
|
Re: Running NanoVNA on MacBook Pro
A number of forum members run their NanoVNA on Mac computers.?Please do some searching around the message topics and you will find a number of threads on this and the issues you might see.? ...
By
Larry Rothman
·
#7242
·
|
Re: Batteries
Hallo Karsten, Ja, if I read you correct, I 100% agree. Vy 73 de Andy
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#7241
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
The 'H' on a NanoVNA-H supposedly means it is a Hugen device. Is there anything keeping the cloners from labeling their devices as -H ?
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#7240
·
|
Re: Batteries
To the question "Trickle charge current is also mentioned on the spec sheet as being 100ma, not enough to kill a 400ma cell." If you read the datasheet fully, you find this lines: #Low Battery voltage
By
Karsten, DD1KT
·
#7239
·
|
Running NanoVNA on MacBook Pro
hi all, forgive me if I missed any previous post on this subject. Is it possible to run a nanoVNA on a MacBook, any problems, how to, s/ware etc ? thanks Wayne VK6EH
By
Wayne Johnson
·
#7238
·
|
Re: Batteries
Agreed. But I was not saying that it should be the case, or was the case ;-) I believe that Li-Ion prefer a typical 0.5C most of the time, so at the worst case lets assume a NanoVNA charge controller
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#7237
·
|
Re: Batteries
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:56 PM, Andy wrote: Trickle charge current is also mentioned on the spec sheet as being 100ma, not enough to kill a 400ma cell. Am I missing something ?
By
hwalker
·
#7236
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#79: Three Animated-GIF/AVIs in Slow Motion Demonstrate, Step-by-Step, the Graphical Construction of Differential Error Regions Arising in the Measurements with [AnyVNA] Hello, Allow us, please, to
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#7235
·
|
Re: Batteries
Quote from spec sheet - ?Charger ?Adaptive charging current control, Adaptive charging current control. Quote from spec sheet - Which in theory should regulate charging current. The world and his
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#7234
·
|
File updated in [email protected]
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that the following files have been updated in the Files area of the [email protected] group. *
By
[email protected] Notification <nanovna-users+notification@...>
·
#7233
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0 - FW version?
Yes, you can upgrade and there is no issue of 'bricking' your unit. Please refer to the Wiki and the User Guide (in the Files section) for info on how to upgrade and how to create a .dfu file if there
By
Larry Rothman
·
#7232
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0 - FW version?
Hi Rune, Thanks! As a matter of fact by using NanoVNA v1.03 I got the following info (although I cant see FW version..): Kernel: 4.0.0 Compiler: GCC4.9.3 ... Architecture: ARMv6-M Core variant:
By
Alessandro I2SVA <i2sva@...>
·
#7231
·
|
Re: running nanoVNA-saver under Linux Mint XFCE
I wouldn't go as far as qbasic but I agree, whenever I see 'python' I anticipate frustration and trouble. It's a mess. It's a great example of why code re-use doesn't scale well. All too often it's
By
Adrian Godwin
·
#7230
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0 - FW version?
Hi Alessandro, Generally, this means your firmware is so old, there is no way to read the firmware version. -- Rune / 5Q5R
By
Rune Broberg
·
#7229
·
|
NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0 - FW version?
Hi all, I noticed that moving to NanoVNASaver 0.2.0 > About, the NanoVNA Firmware version displayed is: NanoVNA Version ? Has anyone noticed the same thing or I have something wrong? NanoVNAe works
By
Alessandro I2SVA <i2sva@...>
·
#7228
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
Many have measured and tested it but found no noticeable difference between the variants. Probably the raw material comes from the same source, pcb is the same. So why would it differ unless the
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#7227
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
Looking again at your pic from Amazon, I notice it is sold by KKMoon. I brought two NanoVNAs from this same seller there. When they arrived one was a clone and the other appears to be a hugen
By
Joe St. Clair AF5MH
·
#7226
·
|