开云体育

Hi I am relatively new to the NanoVNA thus the NanoVNA-Saver but I have spent a number of hours in front of an 8753C :-) I really like the NanoVNA-Saver and therefore have some ideas for further

qrp.ddc, You are absolutely wrong in saying TDR on the NanoVNA is a 'waste of time'. This is essentially an Amateur Radio hobby forum. Amateurs have been at the forefront of many new innovations in

How can you tell if it is shielded?? I see several small shielding "cans" on the PCB.? Is that the only shielding that the "shielded" ones have??? Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's

Rune,? The only problem I had was that Norton AV thinks it is malware and quarentines it. Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and a light, broadcastin' the resistance, through

more FFT size leads to better time resolution. I don't need to measure cable length with TDR, this is not reliable way, because it depends on cable velocity factor which may vary even through cable

Hi Norbert, Thanks for testing the new functionality! The warnings are normal, sadly, and really just show how the data from the NanoVNA sometimes shows up very corrupted on the PC. I don't know what

UOn Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 15:12, yza <yzaVNA@...> wrote: 18 : @Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd : No problem at all. This looks interesting. We much appreciate that; indeed. Therefore,

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:04 PM, Rune Broberg wrote: > > I just released 0.0.12: > > https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/tag/v0.0.12 > > This release of NanoVNA-Saver offers a number of

max efficiency happens when you match output impedance with the load on the output connector. More hot on the load means better match and better efficiency. This is pretty easy. For maximum efficiency

Hi Rune I forgot the saving calibration is not providing and info for where to save. I doubt it is saving at all. The guided calibration is perfectly done clear and crisp to understand Kind regards

Hi Rune Version 0.0.12 great news. I have tested your calibration using the Delay and L/C coefficients together with my HP83033C female calibration standards and tested the calculated data for

Hi David, thanks for offering to try out on Solaris - it'd be fun if it worked there as well :-) I don't have any architecture-specific code, so as long as the prerequisites (pyqt5 and pyserial) are

Hi Nick, the scaling of the R+jX axes works for me - make sure you switch it from "automatic" to "fixed"; otherwise, it won't take effect. If you still have problems, I might need to have a further

Hi Norbert, Thanks for testing the new functionality! The warnings are normal, sadly, and really just show how the data from the NanoVNA sometimes shows up very corrupted on the PC. I don't know what

Hi DMR, I found the bug you are referring to - I'll get it fixed in the next version, and obviously pushed to GitHub as soon as it's fixed :-) Thanks! -- Rune / 5Q5R

Hi Nick, make sure you're running 0.0.12 - the version number should be in the title bar. The "Calibration assistant" button is what you're after: [image: image.png] -- Rune / 5Q5R

And of course, the real answer to your question is the following: If you want a reliable radio equipment, buy reputable a ham radio =radio amateur products or even professional radio products. They

Hi Rune How do I start this wizard? Can't see it in the Calibration window. Using Mint Linux 19.2 x64, Python 3.7.3. 73 Nick G3VNC

Rudi, It is *not* anyone’s duty to convert their Fortran to Python! Nor is it their duty to show examples of show input or output, nor is it it their duty to write the information in a coherent way.

BTW..... this version is the so-called "better" one with shielding. It is better construction than my "white salamander worst" unit or my black "worse" one. The noise floor might be slightly lower on