@Gary O'Neil, N3GO : 20 December 2019
/g/nanovna-users/message/8429 Dear Gary, Thank you, very much indeed, because you noticed this ! Well, in our sow this means : "keep the signal flow diagrams, use them to correctly express the relations between a-s and b-s at joining ports, and forget the -most disorientating- "rules" of them". And we used it in this way for more than 25 years until last January 2019, when we found -with much pleasure, indeed- its full independent justification at: D. M. Kerns and R. W. Beatty, "Basic Theory of Wave guide Junctions and Introductory Microwave Network Analysis" [*], Part 2, Introductory Microwave Network Analysis, 2.18 Signal Flow Graph Applied to the Scattering Equations pp.123-124, International Series of Monographs in Electromagnetic Waves, Editors: A. L. Cullen, V. A. Fock J. R. Wait, Volume 13, Pergamon Press Inc, First Edition, 1967: "(f) Comments on use of signal ?ow graphs This technique offers nothing fundamentally new and, if correctly applied, yields the same results one would obtain by solutions of the scattering equations. It seems to be simpler in some eases to write down the solutions by inspection of diagrams rather than by algebraic manipulations. However, one must he careful not to miss any of the loops, and this is a possible source of difficulty, especially when we are dealing with 3-ports, 4-ports, or more complicated networks. As a graphical aid to intuitive thinking about the analysis of systems, it is no doubt valuable, and is therefore a tool to supplement conventional algebraic analysis." Best regards, gin&pez@arg [*] 16 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/7092 |