How does this differ from the 4.3" NanoVNA-F already available?
Tnx,
Dale W4OP
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From:
[email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 1:05 PM
To:
[email protected]Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] First PCB pictures of the V2
Just another voice asking for a large screen version -- I would really
like that!
Thanks for all you're doing!
John
----
On 12/17/19 11:44 AM, Gabriel Tenma White wrote:
shields: I'll be characterizing the sensitivity to external interference before making a final decision on which shields to include.
jog switch: in our tests the switch's position didn't affect usability with cables connected. The switch is less likely to be damaged because it does not protrude as much as it does on the original Nano, and in this position the RF connectors actually protect it from being jammed.
firmware upgrade: the F303 used in the V2 does not have a built in bootloader, so we will look into choices of bootloaders. Most likely the upgrade process will be similar to the -F, but I can't make any promises yet.
display: The ST7796S is command-compatible with the ILI9341 so menu-driven switchover may be doable. I can see an image when I swap a ST7796S display in without any code changes, just in a corner of the screen and flipped. The team will make a decision about whether to offer two versions for sale.
