I agree with David. I bought a Nano VNA which is very good for the money but my eyes are not good enough for it to be of any use as a portable instrument so I immediately ordered a NanoVNA-F purely for the larger screen. The NanoVNA is now primarily used with the PC.
73
Conrad PA5Y
________________________________
From:
[email protected] <
[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd via Groups.Io <drkirkby@...>
Sent: 22 November 2019 17:30
To:
[email protected] <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] F303 and 4" LCD for next generation NanoVNA #circuit #flash_size #improvement #enclosure #battery
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:32, David J Taylor via Groups.Io <gm8arv=
[email protected]> wrote:
For me, having the extra resolution of the 4.3-inch display would be a
significant benefit, and the extra size would not be unwelcome. More than
101 points per plot would be possible. The increased weight would be more
than offset by increased usage time. We already see some of these
advantages in the NanoVNA-F.
73,
David GM8ARV
I agree with David - weight is not an issue.
I think if Hugen wants to sell these in a reasonable quantity, I think the
screen will need to be at least as big as the NanoVNA-F, as I think many
people will buy the NanoVNA-F for a better screen.
Dave.
--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...
Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100
Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United
Kingdom
