Hello David.
I have a very specific use for the NanoVNA-F, basically the VNA-H is too small to be useful with my poor eyesight. I have a VNA-H and it compares very favourably with my HP-8712B. The VNA-F will be used for outside antenna work from 50-432MHz, that's all.
These things are really great for such a cheap piece of kit! I also have some proper cal kits to check them with ?
73
Conrad PA5Y
________________________________
From:
[email protected] <
[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd via Groups.Io <drkirkby@...>
Sent: 19 November 2019 03:14
To:
[email protected] <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] BH5HNU NanoVNA-F Aliexpress site no longer there?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 17:43, hwalker <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:
Dave,
Yes, Hugen's product is the 2.8" NanoVNA-H, and BH5HNU's is the 4.3"
NanoVNA-F. BH5HNU has been so busy with orders and production that he
hasn't had a chance to devote a lot of time to documentation and software
development. Because the NanoVNA-F and NanoVNA-H have a lot of
crossover, not only in how they operate, but in user's who own both
models, ssome NanoVNA-F owners join the discussions on this board looking
for information.
It leads to confusion at times because the NanoVNA-H's firmware is more
advanced than the NanoVNA-F. The NanoVNA-F owner then begins to wonder why
a feature described in the NanoVNA's operating manual isn't available on
his device.
Herb
Yes, I got the feeling that the -F version was a bit less advanced. I have
the standard model, and will eventually upgrade, but I will make a decision
about what to upgrade to later.
--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...
Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100
Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United
Kingdom
