¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0


 

David F4HTQ wrote:

"finally I do not wait for the weekend :)"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The test method you described seemed simple enough to give it a quick go. Attached is a photo of the test set-up I used. One turn of wire attached to a Banana-BNC adapter and connected to CH0, hopefully similar to your description.

I pulled out the first ferrite core I could find and measured it. The initial curve from 100k-30M looked like junk below 1M and not enough definition at 30 MHz. I changed the range to 1M -100M. The core is definitely not type 43 and pretty broadband in nature. I measured two other cores just like it and their curves overlapped. Found identifying markings on the cores - Laird type 28B2400-000. Found the curves for Laird 28B on-line and have attached them.

The Laird 28B series is definitely broadband but not sure I could have identified my cores from the Laird curves without priori information. The NanoVNA curves for all three cores did match and I suppose I could build up a signature database and use it to sort unknown ferrites.

Thanks for giving me another idea for using the NanoVNA.

- Herb

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.