Hello - thank you for acknowledging start of this group (I started it in June 2019 having been an early adopter of nanovna, and have been pleased with the growth and extraordinarily high signal-to-noise ratio that the group's members have maintained - excellent!)
I wish to specifically thank KC0WJN (Dave as well) who has been serving as co-owner and been an experienced, invaluable guide as the group has grown.
I am aware that the traffic level is high relative to some other groups, and some structural proposals have been floated from time to time.
I have the following recommendations:
1. If you get single-message delivery and feel the traffic level is high, I urge you to consider using digest mode. You should receive 3-4 e-mails per day, and within these the messages are threaded.
2. The group's traffic is inherently not perfectly organized - there *will* be some duplication, threads that change mid-stream, and so on. This is OK and good - when you see duplication and feel it's important, quoting URL of a previous relevant thread will help those that are currently participating, as well as those that happen onto the archives in the future.
3. Consider trying the groups.io web interface if you're not currently using it (you can use the web interface alongside your e-mail client - that's what I do). Consider searching for topics of interest. Save or bookmark e-mails of particular interest.
Thank you again for your participation in nanovna-users - keep contributing, keep learning, keep the signal-to-noise ratio high, and remember that nanovna and this group have helped bring capable RF vector network analysis solutions become accessible in ways not previously experienced.
73 Dave WB0GAZ