Good afternoon nikolitsa oe3zgn|sv7dmc & petros oe3zzp|sv7bax @ arg iaoi nfi;
As I stated in an earlier post, our communications get somewhat contaminated in translation. Please understand that you have my unreserved agreement on your definition. My use of quotation marks encompassing any... i.e. ¡°any¡± VNA was intended to communicate that I am not all knowing with respect to the architectural differences employed by various equipment manufacturers. In the context of our discussions, I also believe that the hardware choice is not relevant, and that it is your desire to focus on the software independent of the hardware choice in the evaluation of the derived measurement uncertainties. My overtly verbose description was an attempt to separate the hardware from the software, to ensure my understanding of the point that the hardware employed for the measurements is irrelevant.
I have not yet read your response in its entirety. I sensed a priority to put your mind at ease, and respond immediately in that regard. I will comment on anything I feel unclear about your response after giving it my undivided attention.
73
Gary, N3GO
agreement
--
73
Gary, N3GO
