¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Measurement correction for Zc Coax caracteristic Impedance


 

?

On 5 Apr 2025, at 12:03?PM, Jim Lux via groups.io <jimlux@...> wrote:

Not unexpected
Zc is sqrt( (R+jomegaL)/(G+jomegaC))
Mostly determined by L/C, but the R is in there too, and it goes up as frequency goes up, because of skin effect. For HF the dielectric loss (G) is really tiny, so the R term dominates.




On Apr 5, 2025, at 05:34, Patricio Greco via groups.io <> <patricio_greco@... <mailto:patricio_greco@...>> wrote:

?Interesting , the Zo uses to rise a little when the frequency goes down.


On 5 Apr 2025, at 6:43?AM, Team-SIM SIM-Mode via groups.io <> <sim31_team@... <mailto:sim31_team@...>> wrote:

Hi
for same RG213 cable (25m length) loaded by a 50.3 Ohm resistor
I used the same circle methode centered on smith graph with the renormalized Z0 impedance ( option added by DiSlord) for different ferquency's band (span always fixed to 4 Mhz) :

2Mhz ---> Zc = 52.6 Ohm
3Mhz ---> Zc = 52.5 Ohm
7Mhz ---> Zc = 52.0 Ohm
14Mhz ---> Zc = 53.0 Ohm
18Mhz ---> Zc = 53.0 Ohm
21Mhz ---> Zc = 54.0 Ohm
24Mhz ---> Zc = 54.0 Ohm
29Mhz ---> Zc = 52.0 Ohm

Direct measurement with Dislord Coax function gives Zc = 51.77 Ohm with same cable.

73's Nizar









Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.